I Matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
TL;DR
Matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers:
From the wikipedia page for Fibonacci numbers, I got that the matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers is:

\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} ^ n =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> F_{n+1} &amp; F_n \\<br /> F_n &amp; F_{n-1}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}

That only works when F_0 = 0 and F_1 = 1. How can I find the matrix representation for arbitrary starting values, for example, when F_0 = a and F_1 = b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
murshid_islam said:
Summary:: Matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers:

From the wikipedia page for Fibonacci numbers, I got that the matrix representation for closed-form expression for Fibonacci numbers is:

\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} ^ n =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> F_{n+1} &amp; F_n \\<br /> F_n &amp; F_{n-1}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}

That only works when F_0 = 0 and F_1 = 1. How can I find the matrix representation for arbitrary starting values, for example, when F_0 = a and F_1 = b?
Start with
\begin{pmatrix}<br /> a+b &amp; b \\<br /> b &amp; a\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} =<br /> <br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> F_2 &amp; F_1 \\<br /> F_1 &amp; F_0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

Then multiply repeatedly on the left by
\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} <br />
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and murshid_islam
Though same as post #2,
2022-05-10 14.01.44.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn and murshid_islam
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K