MHB Matrix solutions with variable coefficient

TheFallen018
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I've got this question, that I think I have figured out, but I'm not completely sure.

Basically, I've got the following matrix to put into RREF. Not really a problem, but I'm not sure if I'm handling the variable incorrectly.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
3 &a &|3
\end{bmatrix}$

So, I subtracted 3*row1 from row2, which resulted in this
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
0 &a+3 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The next thing I did is where I'm not sure about. I divided row2 by (a+3), and then added the resulting row into row 1 to get the matrix in RREF.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &0 &|1 \\
0 &1 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The remaining parts of the question ask me to find values of a where there is a unique solution, no solutions, and infinitely many solutions.

My thoughts were that there's no value a can take that will make the bottom row inconsistent, so there's no value where there's no solution. There can be infinitely many solutions if we go back to the part where we still have (a+3) in the second row. If we make a equal to -3, then $x_{2}$ becomes a free variable and gives us infinitely many solutions. If a is any other value, then there is a unique solution.

Does that seem right? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheFallen018 said:
Hey guys,

I've got this question, that I think I have figured out, but I'm not completely sure.

Basically, I've got the following matrix to put into RREF. Not really a problem, but I'm not sure if I'm handling the variable incorrectly.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
3 &a &|3
\end{bmatrix}$

So, I subtracted 3*row1 from row2, which resulted in this
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
0 &a+3 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The next thing I did is where I'm not sure about. I divided row2 by (a+3), and then added the resulting row into row 1 to get the matrix in RREF.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &0 &|1 \\
0 &1 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The remaining parts of the question ask me to find values of a where there is a unique solution, no solutions, and infinitely many solutions.

My thoughts were that there's no value a can take that will make the bottom row inconsistent, so there's no value where there's no solution. There can be infinitely many solutions if we go back to the part where we still have (a+3) in the second row. If we make a equal to -3, then $x_{2}$ becomes a free variable and gives us infinitely many solutions. If a is any other value, then there is a unique solution.

Does that seem right? Thanks
Your conclusions are correct (solution is unique except when $a=-3$, when there are infinitely many solutions). But the RREF is only equal to $\begin{bmatrix}1 &0 &|1 \\ 0 &1 &|0 \end{bmatrix}$ when $a\ne-3$. In fact, if $a=-3$ then you cannot divide by $a+3$, so the final step of your calculation of the RREF is invalid in that case. If $a=-3$ then the previous step in the calculation becomes $\begin{bmatrix}1 &-1 &|1 \\ 0 &0 &|0 \end{bmatrix}$, and that is the RREF when $a=-3$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K