Matrix solutions with variable coefficient

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the Reduced Row Echelon Form (RREF) of the matrix $\begin{bmatrix} 1 &-1 &|1 \\ 3 &a &|3 \end{bmatrix}$. The correct RREF is $\begin{bmatrix} 1 &0 &|1 \\ 0 &1 &|0 \end{bmatrix}$ when $a \ne -3$. If $a = -3$, the calculation becomes invalid due to division by zero, resulting in $\begin{bmatrix} 1 &-1 &|1 \\ 0 &0 &|0 \end{bmatrix}$. The values of $a$ yield a unique solution for all $a$ except $-3$, which leads to infinitely many solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically row reduction
  • Familiarity with concepts of unique, no, and infinitely many solutions in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of the implications of variable coefficients in matrices
  • Proficiency in using RREF for solving linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of variable coefficients in linear systems
  • Learn about the conditions for unique, no, and infinitely many solutions in linear algebra
  • Explore the concept of matrix rank and its relationship to solutions of linear equations
  • Practice additional examples of RREF calculations with variable coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators looking for examples of matrix manipulation and solution analysis.

TheFallen018
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I've got this question, that I think I have figured out, but I'm not completely sure.

Basically, I've got the following matrix to put into RREF. Not really a problem, but I'm not sure if I'm handling the variable incorrectly.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
3 &a &|3
\end{bmatrix}$

So, I subtracted 3*row1 from row2, which resulted in this
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
0 &a+3 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The next thing I did is where I'm not sure about. I divided row2 by (a+3), and then added the resulting row into row 1 to get the matrix in RREF.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &0 &|1 \\
0 &1 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The remaining parts of the question ask me to find values of a where there is a unique solution, no solutions, and infinitely many solutions.

My thoughts were that there's no value a can take that will make the bottom row inconsistent, so there's no value where there's no solution. There can be infinitely many solutions if we go back to the part where we still have (a+3) in the second row. If we make a equal to -3, then $x_{2}$ becomes a free variable and gives us infinitely many solutions. If a is any other value, then there is a unique solution.

Does that seem right? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheFallen018 said:
Hey guys,

I've got this question, that I think I have figured out, but I'm not completely sure.

Basically, I've got the following matrix to put into RREF. Not really a problem, but I'm not sure if I'm handling the variable incorrectly.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
3 &a &|3
\end{bmatrix}$

So, I subtracted 3*row1 from row2, which resulted in this
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &-1 &|1 \\
0 &a+3 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The next thing I did is where I'm not sure about. I divided row2 by (a+3), and then added the resulting row into row 1 to get the matrix in RREF.
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 &0 &|1 \\
0 &1 &|0
\end{bmatrix}$

The remaining parts of the question ask me to find values of a where there is a unique solution, no solutions, and infinitely many solutions.

My thoughts were that there's no value a can take that will make the bottom row inconsistent, so there's no value where there's no solution. There can be infinitely many solutions if we go back to the part where we still have (a+3) in the second row. If we make a equal to -3, then $x_{2}$ becomes a free variable and gives us infinitely many solutions. If a is any other value, then there is a unique solution.

Does that seem right? Thanks
Your conclusions are correct (solution is unique except when $a=-3$, when there are infinitely many solutions). But the RREF is only equal to $\begin{bmatrix}1 &0 &|1 \\ 0 &1 &|0 \end{bmatrix}$ when $a\ne-3$. In fact, if $a=-3$ then you cannot divide by $a+3$, so the final step of your calculation of the RREF is invalid in that case. If $a=-3$ then the previous step in the calculation becomes $\begin{bmatrix}1 &-1 &|1 \\ 0 &0 &|0 \end{bmatrix}$, and that is the RREF when $a=-3$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K