Matrix with Power of n: Evaluating Real Number Values | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter MechaMZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Power
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the power of a matrix B, defined with real number parameters a and n. Participants explore the implications of allowing n to be any real number, particularly in the context of matrix exponentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest various methods for evaluating the matrix power, including expanding for small values of n, using the binomial theorem, and questioning the feasibility of raising a matrix to irrational powers.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with multiple interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants express concerns about the implications of a and n being any real numbers, particularly regarding the existence of the matrix and the nature of its powers. Suggestions for approaches, such as induction and pattern recognition, have been offered without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definitions of a and n, especially in cases where they may lead to undefined or complex results. Participants are considering the constraints imposed by these values on the matrix's existence and properties.

MechaMZ
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a and n could be any real number, please evaluate the value.

[tex] B =\left [<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> a&1&0\\<br /> 0&a&0\\<br /> 0&0&a<br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right ][/tex]n

I've no idea how to approach this question, because i have never came across the matrix with power not equals to -1.
could somebody give me some hints?

I've try to let n = -1 by using gauss jordan elimination, and let then elements become 1/a, 1/a2 and etc. but this seems incorrect and not what the question asking for..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can either expand it for small values of n and guess the pattern and prove it works by induction (if you have to). Or write the matrix as aI+J, where I is the identity and J is zero except for that off diagonal 1. Now, I and J commute, so you can apply the binomial theorem to (aI+J)^n.
 
Are you sure that the problem says that n could be any real number? You're going to have a hard time raising your matrix to the power [itex]\pi[/itex], say.
 
yeah, the question states the a and n is any real value. but why power of pi?

but I'm not very sure this question is asking me to find the n and a value or prove it could be done by any real value(for a and n)
 
I understand that the problem is not asking you to find a and n, but if n can be any real number, then there is nothing that prevents n from being [itex]\pi[/itex]. If so, what does it mean to raise a matrix to an irrational power? A more reasonable interpretation, IMO, would be that n is a positive integer, for which math induction would be one approach.
 
I'm with the others. If both a and n can be any real numbers, then for some combinations of a and n, the matrix won't even exist. For example, if a= 0 and n= -1, B-1 will not exist. If a is negative and n = 1/2, you are going to run into complex numbers. If a can be any real number, and n any positive integer, the problem is relatively simple. Calculate B, B2, B3, make a good guess at what the general form will be and, as Mark44 suggested, prove it by induction.
 
Boo hoo. Nobody likes my binomial theorem suggestion??
 
I like it. I was just offering another possible slant.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm with the others. If both a and n can be any real numbers, then for some combinations of a and n, the matrix won't even exist. For example, if a= 0 and n= -1, B-1 will not exist. If a is negative and n = 1/2, you are going to run into complex numbers. If a can be any real number, and n any positive integer, the problem is relatively simple. Calculate B, B2, B3, make a good guess at what the general form will be and, as Mark44 suggested, prove it by induction.

yeah, i like this solution =)
thanks all
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K