Matter-Energy Conversion: Gravity & Speed Questions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of matter into energy, specifically addressing the implications for gravity and the speed of gravitational effects. Participants explore theoretical aspects, implications of energy forms, and the nature of gravity in relation to these conversions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that matter can be converted into energy, raising questions about the gravitational effects of this conversion.
  • One participant mentions that energy can have mass-equivalence concerning gravity, suggesting that high energy densities could lead to phenomena like wormholes.
  • Another participant states that gravity travels at the speed of light, implying that the gravitational effects of removing the sun would be noticed after approximately 8.5 minutes.
  • There is a discussion about electromagnetic (E.M.) radiation resulting from matter conversion, with some arguing that while radiation is affected by gravity, it does not exert gravitational influence due to the lack of mass.
  • Contradictory views arise regarding whether E.M. radiation acts as a source of gravity, with some asserting it does and others claiming it does not.
  • One participant suggests that matter can become various forms of energy beyond just electromagnetic radiation, citing examples like beta and alpha radiation.
  • Another participant emphasizes that at a fundamental level, matter is energy in a bound state, and this perspective aids in understanding mass-energy conversions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the gravitational influence of E.M. radiation and the nature of energy forms resulting from matter conversion. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of energy and mass, and there are unresolved questions regarding the implications of gravitational effects in the context of matter-energy conversion.

Nahaz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Matter can be turned into energy, correct?

If so, what happens to matter's gravity when it's converted to energy?

Also how fast is gravity? If the sun was hypothetically removed, would the Earth cease falling towards the sun's former position immediately, or in ~8mins?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Nahaz. Welcome to PF. I'm not certain about your first question. Energy can have a mass-equivalence with regard to gravity, as far as I know. A high enough energy density, for example, can form a wormhole. (A negative energy concentration is needed to sustain it.) Long story short... I'll leave this for someone else more qualified.
According to both theory and all observations to date, gravity travels at the speed of light. Your removal of the sun, therefore, would be noticed gravitationally at the same time as it would be visually. That, as you indicated, is approximately 8 1/2 minutes after the fact.
 
Last edited:
Matter when converted to energy forms E.M radiation. The radiation can be affected by gravity but has no gravitational influence of its own as this requires mass.
 
Kurdt said:
Matter when converted to energy forms E.M radiation. The radiation can be affected by gravity but has no gravitational influence of its own as this requires mass.

In fact, EM radiation does act as a source of gravity. Anything with energy (or momentum) does. This, however, is only manifest in the source term of General Relativity, not in Newtonian gravity.
 
Kurdt said:
Matter when converted to energy forms E.M radiation. The radiation can be affected by gravity but has no gravitational influence of its own as this requires mass.
Parlyne said:
In fact, EM radiation does act as a source of gravity. Anything with energy (or momentum) does. This, however, is only manifest in the source term of General Relativity, not in Newtonian gravity.

Am i wrong or you said 2 different things? Parlyne says that em causes a grav field and Kurdt that it doesn't.

However energy is only EM? couldn't matter become another type of energy...i don't know...not EM?
 
Matter can, of course, become other types of energy, if you use a looser definition. Electrons, for example, are considered beta radiation when they start running amok. Likewise for alpha radiation, which is essentially a hydrogen nucleus (proton, or proton + 1 or 2 neutrons), and neutrons themselves are considered radiation in a bomb or reactor.
On the bottom level, matter is just energy in a bound state. By that token, all matter is already energy. That, though, is EM when fully broken down. Matter + anti-matter = gamma.
 
Well while it is true that photons have self gravity I thought it best not to get into the details of considerenig the nature of the self gravitation for photons. But consider the fact that a photon travels at the speed of light and so does the gravitational force.
 
Yeah... it's a pretty squirrelly subject. In fact, it's quite beyond my educational level. I was just kind of summing things up with the least hassle (to me). :biggrin:
 
Nahaz said:
Hi all,

Matter can be turned into energy, correct?

If so, what happens to matter's gravity when it's converted to energy?

Also how fast is gravity? If the sun was hypothetically removed, would the Earth cease falling towards the sun's former position immediately, or in ~8mins?

Thanks
It is more correct to say that matter can be turned into EM radiation and that for the mass, m, of a closed system there is a total energy, E, which corresponds to this mass. E.g. increase the energy of an object and the object's mass will increase. However both the total energy and the total mass of any closed system is a constant which cannot be increased nor decreased.

Pete
 
  • #10
Danger said:
On the bottom level, matter is just energy in a bound state. By that token, all matter is already energy.
This, to me, makes the most sense about mass-energy conversions. It is easy to think about, and there is no possibility that it can be faulted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K