Max Upward Force to Hold Bowling Ball on Wall

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 4.5-kg bowling ball resting against a wall and a ledge, where the goal is to determine the maximum upward force that can be applied without causing the ball to rotate or fall. The context includes static friction and the forces acting on the ball due to gravity and applied tension.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationships between frictional forces and normal forces, questioning the setup of equations and the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the ball.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the forces involved and the equations needed to solve the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between forces, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for a third equation to solve the problem, as well as the importance of distinguishing between different normal forces acting on the ball. There is also mention of potential miscommunication regarding the application of frictional forces.

mattbeatlefreak
Messages
34
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A 4.5-kg bowling ball is perched on a concrete ledge directly below your dorm room window, with the side of the ball opposite the holes touching the wall. Wanting to hold the ball in place so that it doesn't roll off and land on somebody, you manage to hook one of the holes with a wire and exert a purely tangential (and vertical) force on the ball. The coefficient of static friction between ball and ledge is the same as that between ball and wall, μs = 0.43. What is the maximum upward force you can exert so that the ball does not rotate and you lose your hold? Even though the ball has holes drilled in it, assume a uniform distribution of inertia.

Homework Equations


τ = Fr
F = ma
ƒ = μN

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a diagram and wrote equations for net torque, net force in x direction, and net force in y direction.

τnet=T-ƒwallledge=0
Fxledge-Nwall=0
Fy=T-mg+Nledgewall=0

To find the maximum force, I set the frictional force from the wall = μ times the normal force from the ledge. Also, I set the frictional force from the ledge = μ times the normal force from the wall.

Substituting values:
T-.43Nledge-.43Nwall=0
.43Nwall-Nwall=0
T-44.1+Nledge+.43Nledge=0

Solving for Nwall gave a value of 0, which doesn't seem correct. Continuing through regardless, I finished with an answer of 10.2 N for the tension, which wasn't correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mattbeatlefreak said:
I set the frictional force from the wall = μ times the normal force from the ledge. Also, I set the frictional force from the ledge = μ times the normal force from the wall.
Did you really do that? A little unconventional perhaps?
 
haruspex said:
Did you really do that? A little unconventional perhaps?
I was told to do that from a tutor I was seeking help from. Clearly there was some misthought or miscommunication.
 
mattbeatlefreak said:
I was told to do that from a tutor I was seeking help from. Clearly there was some misthought or miscommunication.
What's the usual relationship between maximum frictional force and normal force?
 
haruspex said:
What's the usual relationship between maximum frictional force and normal force?
ƒs = μs x FN
 
mattbeatlefreak said:
ƒs = μs x FN
Yes, but what are those two forces exactly? Where do they act and in what directions in relation to each other?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mattbeatlefreak
haruspex said:
Yes, but what are those two forces exactly? Where do they act and in what directions in relation to each other?
Since friction is along a surface, and normal force is perpendicular to the surface, the forces should be perpendicular to one another. So in this case, the max friction force (along wall) would equal the μs times the normal force from the wall? And same thing for the ledge?
 
mattbeatlefreak said:
Since friction is along a surface, and normal force is perpendicular to the surface, the forces should be perpendicular to one another. So in this case, the max friction force (along wall) would equal the μs times the normal force from the wall? And same thing for the ledge?
Yes.
 
haruspex said:
Yes.
I got 15 N for the tension, and this answer is correct. Thanks for all your help!
 
  • #10
Care to explain further? I'm stumped on this one too.
 
  • #11
Scigirl said:
Care to explain further? I'm stumped on this one too.
As with the initial post of a thread, if you have the same homework you need to post your attempt.
Have you drawn a diagram? What forces act on the ball?
 
  • #12
Fx=Normalforce (wall)-Friction (ledge)=0
Fy=Normal(ledge)+Tension-mg-friction(wall)=0

Solved for Y direction for Normal Force Fn= (mg-T)/0.57
Then plugged into T=mg-fs-Fn
 
  • #13
Scigirl said:
Fx=Normalforce (wall)-Friction (ledge)=0
Fy=Normal(ledge)+Tension-mg-friction(wall)=0
You have two equations but three unknowns. What do you need to do?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
You have two equations but three unknowns. What do you need to do?
Do I need a third equation? f=μN?
 
  • #15
Scigirl said:
Do I need a third equation? f=μN?
You need a third equation, but I was assuming you were already using f=μN. (If not, you had five unknowns.)
In 2D statics problems, there are always three equations available. Exactly which three is a matter of choice, but the usual choice is horizontal linear force balance, vertical linear force balance, and ...?
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
You need a third equation, but I was assuming you were already using f=μN. (If not, you had five unknowns.)
In 2D statics problems, there are always three equations available. Exactly which three is a matter of choice, but the usual choice is horizontal linear force balance, vertical linear force balance, and ...?
Rotational force? Torque perhaps? Torque=rF
 
  • #17
Scigirl said:
Rotational force? Torque perhaps? Torque=rF
Yes.
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Yes.

I'm not sure how to use torque in this situation, is the Net torque from the tension and the 2 frictions?
 
  • #19
Scigirl said:
I'm not sure how to use torque in this situation, is the Net torque from the tension and the 2 frictions?
All the forces contribute to torque in principle, but you can eliminate some by choosing an axis through which the forces pass. E.g. if you choose the centre of the ball then you can ignore the normal forces because they have no torque about that point.
 
  • #20
Στ=τT-2τf
Tr=2(μFn)r
T=2μ[(mg-T)/(1-μ)]
This is what I got using Net Torque and ΣFy
 
  • #21
Scigirl said:
Στ=τT-2τf
Tr=2(μFn)r
T=2μ[(mg-T)/(1-μ)]
This is what I got using Net Torque and ΣFy
Are the two normal forces the same? It is important to use different symbols for variables with potentially different values.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K