Maximizing Cavitation to Heat Water Efficiently Without Electricity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding an efficient method to heat 600 ml of water using cavitation without electricity or non-human power. The main questions raised are whether cavitation can generate significant heat in a short time and how to maximize its effectiveness through design choices like tube diameter and screw length. While some suggestions include using a stationary bike or hand-crank devices to create agitation, the consensus leans towards skepticism about the practicality of achieving meaningful heating through cavitation alone. High RPM is emphasized as crucial for cavitation, but participants generally consider the effort to be largely ineffective. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges and limitations of using cavitation for water heating.
TromboneNerd
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
I need to find the most efficient way to each 600 ml of water without using an electric heat source or any non human power. I thought i would use a combination of agitation and cavitation, with a screw with lots of "dimples" that create the pockets of low resistance that would create cavitation inside a tube. I can't find any information on cavitation other than what it is on a basic level so i have a few questions.
1) is this even worth it? is the heat caused by cavitation going to be significant enough in such a short time?
2) if it is, how can i maximize it? Should i use a narrower tube with a longer screw to spread the water out? or should i have a thicker tube so i can maximize the surface area of the screw blades, maximizing cavitation?

though I'm in high school, I've studied into multivariable calculus so if you have any equations whatsoever, please share them no matter how mathematically complex. any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Get on a stationary bike with an alternator/dynamo, and put a resistor in the water. Get an eggbeater with a crank, and modify it to increase turbulence. Put the water in a cannister, pump the pressure in the cannister up to a high pressure, then let it out through a very fine seive (like a porous plug). Get a hand-crank transfer pump and do the same thing by recycling through pump.

The stationary bike should generate 100 watts (~1/8th HP) for 30 minutes.

Bob S
 
I want to create my own idea. that's where the fun is. I'm looking for helpful information about cavitation principles and water heating in general, not a pre-made design to follow, though I appreciate the effort.
 
The main thing to consider is conservation of energy. The details of how drag is generated are less important than the torque and rpm themselves.
 
1) is this even worth it? is the heat caused by cavitation going to be significant enough in such a short time?

no.



2) if it is, how can i maximize it?

high RPM is necessary to maximize cavitation...but it's a useless exercise...

Try reading here for possible ideas...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
569
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K