Maximizing Learning: Textbook Strategies for Studying Effectively

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on different approaches to reading textbooks, particularly whether to read them linearly or skip sections to focus on key concepts. It is generally agreed that the first few chapters are essential, but readers can jump to other chapters with caution, as some require prior knowledge from earlier sections. Many participants express a tendency to skip less critical sections and focus on the "meat" of the subject, often driven by ideas sparked during reading. Some participants emphasize the importance of working through exercises selectively rather than completing every problem, while others prefer to engage deeply with the material by taking notes and revisiting problems after reading. The conversation also touches on the balance between breadth and depth of knowledge, with varying opinions on which is more beneficial. Ultimately, there is a consensus that enjoyment and engagement in the learning process enhance retention and understanding.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
do you read a textbook in a linear fashion (doing all the problems), or do you skip sections to get to the so-called "meat" of the subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the first few chapters (say 3 at most) are usually always mandatory. You can certainly jump to other chapters, but beware some chapters require that you read some other chapter.

If you read the introduction of the textbook, the authors sometimes explains other ways to read the book.
 
i read what i need
 
in read until i get distracted by ideas that pop into my head, which are generated by the book's discussion.
 
I skip sections to get to the so-called "meat" of the subject.

When making exercises, i used to just select a few for each different topic that was treated in the book. I never made every (or a lot of) exercise.

regards

marlon
 
I jump right to the problems and work on a few for a couple hours, then I read through the chapter and try the problems again.
 
I read the text in detail, take careful notes, read the examples and take about an half and hour to think through what I have read. Then I do all of the problem sets available.
 
wow, and you still have time to learn all of the topics in the book? wouldn't that take like a year or so? You think it is better to have more breadth of knowledge or more depth of knowledge (i.e. know a lot of subjects well, or like one subject extremely well?)
 
courtrigrad said:
wow, and you still have time to learn all of the topics in the book? wouldn't that take like a year or so? You think it is better to have more breadth of knowledge or more depth of knowledge (i.e. know a lot of subjects well, or like one subject extremely well?)

No. There is nothing like the pleasure of the highest grade if you worked hard for it. Time flies when you are having fun.

You can combine both.

Although if there is something easy, I usually skip it by just reading it once quickly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K