MHB Maximizing Volume of a Cuboid - Nthabiseng P's Q&A

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the volume of a cuboid with a fixed surface area. The initial box dimensions are given, and the volume and surface area are calculated as 30,000 cm³ and 6,200 cm², respectively. To find the dimensions of a new box with the same surface area that maximizes volume, it is suggested to use derivatives and Lagrange multipliers. The conclusion indicates that the optimal dimensions for maximum volume occur when all sides are equal, leading to a cubic shape where each side measures approximately 10√93/3 cm. This approach confirms that the dimensions yielding the largest volume under the given constraints are equal.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Mathematics -derivatives?

Hi

Can someone help me to solve the following problem please

A box in the shape of a cuboid has dimensions:
Height: 50 cm
Width: 30 cm
Height: 20 cm
a) Calculate the total transmission restriction area and volume. ( i have done this)

need help with number b

b) Construct a new box with the same restriction area as the first box, but with different dimensions. Which dimensions of the box (length, width and height) give the largest possible volume?

(Hint: second box smallest side will be square. Calling the short side length of x and the long side length of y)Here's how far I've come:

a)
V = 20 * 30 * 50 = 30000 cm ^ 3
A = 2 (20 * 30) +2 (20 * 50) +2 (30 * 50) = 6200cm ^ 2

b)
V = x ^ 2 * y
A = 2 (x * x) +2 (x * y) +2 (x * y) = 2x ^ 2 +4 xy = 6200 cm ^ 2

I should use the derivatives but I do not know how.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello nthabiseng p,

Let's first verify the given hint is true. For this I suggest using Lagrange multipliers. I will let the non-negative dimensions of the cuboid be $x,y,z$.

We have the objective function:

$$V(x,y,z)=xyz$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y,z)=2xy+2xz+2yz-S=0$$ where $S$ is the surface area to which we are restricted.

Thus, we find the system:

$$yz=(2y+2z)\lambda$$

$$xz=(2x+2z)\lambda$$

$$xy=(2x+2y)\lambda$$

This system implies that for non-zero dimension values, we must have:

$$x=y=z$$

So we know the given hint is true. Substituting into the constraint, we find:

$$6x^2=S\,\therefore\,x=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Thus, we should find the dimensions of the cuboid having a given surface area $S$ to be:

$$x=y=z=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Now, assuming we are to use single-variable calculus instead, along with the given hint ($z=x$), we could write:

$$V=x^2y$$

$$S=2x^2+4xy$$

Solving the second equation for $y$, we find:

$$y=\frac{S-2x^2}{4x}$$

Substituting for $y$ into the first equation, there results:

$$V(x)=x^2\left(\frac{S-2x^2}{4x} \right)=\frac{1}{4}\left(Sx-2x^3 \right)$$

Now, differentiating and equating to zero to find the critical point, we get:

$$V'(x)=\frac{1}{4}\left(S-6x^2 \right)=0$$

Since we require $$0\le x$$ we get the critical value:

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Now, using the second-derivative test, we find:

$$V''(x)=-3x$$

We see the function is concave down for any positive value of $x$, thus we know our critical value is at a maximum, which is global.

And so, using the value for $y(x)$, we find:

$$y=\frac{S-\frac{S}{3}}{4\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}}=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Hence, we find that:

$$x=y=z=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Using the value $$S=6200\text{ cm}^2$$ we then find:

$$x=y=z=\frac{10\sqrt{93}}{3}\,\text{cm}$$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top