MHB Maximizing Volume of a Cuboid - Nthabiseng P's Q&A

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Mathematics -derivatives?

Hi

Can someone help me to solve the following problem please

A box in the shape of a cuboid has dimensions:
Height: 50 cm
Width: 30 cm
Height: 20 cm
a) Calculate the total transmission restriction area and volume. ( i have done this)

need help with number b

b) Construct a new box with the same restriction area as the first box, but with different dimensions. Which dimensions of the box (length, width and height) give the largest possible volume?

(Hint: second box smallest side will be square. Calling the short side length of x and the long side length of y)Here's how far I've come:

a)
V = 20 * 30 * 50 = 30000 cm ^ 3
A = 2 (20 * 30) +2 (20 * 50) +2 (30 * 50) = 6200cm ^ 2

b)
V = x ^ 2 * y
A = 2 (x * x) +2 (x * y) +2 (x * y) = 2x ^ 2 +4 xy = 6200 cm ^ 2

I should use the derivatives but I do not know how.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello nthabiseng p,

Let's first verify the given hint is true. For this I suggest using Lagrange multipliers. I will let the non-negative dimensions of the cuboid be $x,y,z$.

We have the objective function:

$$V(x,y,z)=xyz$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y,z)=2xy+2xz+2yz-S=0$$ where $S$ is the surface area to which we are restricted.

Thus, we find the system:

$$yz=(2y+2z)\lambda$$

$$xz=(2x+2z)\lambda$$

$$xy=(2x+2y)\lambda$$

This system implies that for non-zero dimension values, we must have:

$$x=y=z$$

So we know the given hint is true. Substituting into the constraint, we find:

$$6x^2=S\,\therefore\,x=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Thus, we should find the dimensions of the cuboid having a given surface area $S$ to be:

$$x=y=z=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Now, assuming we are to use single-variable calculus instead, along with the given hint ($z=x$), we could write:

$$V=x^2y$$

$$S=2x^2+4xy$$

Solving the second equation for $y$, we find:

$$y=\frac{S-2x^2}{4x}$$

Substituting for $y$ into the first equation, there results:

$$V(x)=x^2\left(\frac{S-2x^2}{4x} \right)=\frac{1}{4}\left(Sx-2x^3 \right)$$

Now, differentiating and equating to zero to find the critical point, we get:

$$V'(x)=\frac{1}{4}\left(S-6x^2 \right)=0$$

Since we require $$0\le x$$ we get the critical value:

$$x=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Now, using the second-derivative test, we find:

$$V''(x)=-3x$$

We see the function is concave down for any positive value of $x$, thus we know our critical value is at a maximum, which is global.

And so, using the value for $y(x)$, we find:

$$y=\frac{S-\frac{S}{3}}{4\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}}=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Hence, we find that:

$$x=y=z=\sqrt{\frac{S}{6}}$$

Using the value $$S=6200\text{ cm}^2$$ we then find:

$$x=y=z=\frac{10\sqrt{93}}{3}\,\text{cm}$$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top