Maximum Angle of Incidence for Glass-Water Boundary?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 7K views
Suavez
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1.0-cm-thick layer of water stands on a horizontal slab of glass. Light from a source within the glass is incident on the glass-water boundary.
What is the maximum angle of incidence for which the light ray can emerge into the air above the water?


Homework Equations


Snell's Law: nisin[tex]\theta[/tex]i = ntsin[tex]\theta[/tex]t


The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a diagram like this:

air (n = 1.00)
________________ light ray[tex]\uparrow[/tex]
water (n = 1.33) light ray[tex]\uparrow[/tex]
________________ light ray[tex]\uparrow[/tex]
glass (n = 1.50) light ray[tex]\uparrow[/tex]

The ray of light travels from the glass upward.

nglasssin90 = nwatersin[tex]\theta[/tex]water

nwatersin[tex]\theta[/tex]water = nairsin[tex]\theta[/tex]air

Therefore, using equality of alternate angles:

nglasssin90 = nairsin[tex]\theta[/tex]air


(1.50)*(sin90) = (1.00)*(sin[tex]\theta[/tex]air)

Solution: undefined
What is the maximum angle of incidence if it is undefined?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about where Snell's law measures [tex]\theta[/tex] from.
 
Rake-MC said:
Think about where Snell's law measures [tex]\theta[/tex] from.

Sorry buddy, that was no help. After spending about an hour on that problem, I think I deserve a little more than that. I don't expect anyone to DO the work for me but come on now, let's be serious.

My question is: What is the maximum angle of incidence for which the light ray can emerge into the air above the water?
 
Yes I am aware of that, I'm showing you what you've done wrong.
For a ray of light perpendicular to the surface, you wrote: [tex]n_1sin(90)[/tex]
Why did you write sin(90)?
Think of where snell's law measures [tex]\theta[/tex] from.
 
Rake-MC said:
Yes I am aware of that, I'm showing you what you've done wrong.
For a ray of light perpendicular to the surface, you wrote: [tex]n_1sin(90)[/tex]
Why did you write sin(90)?
Think of where snell's law measures [tex]\theta[/tex] from.

If it is incident it's perpendicular and if it's perpendicular it's 90 degrees.
 
90 degrees from the tangent.
doesn't Snell's law measure [tex]\theta[/tex] from the normal?
 
Rake-MC said:
90 degrees from the tangent.
doesn't Snell's law measure [tex]\theta[/tex] from the normal?

Ok, so that makes it 45 degrees?