Find the Angle of Incidence for Total Internal Reflection in a Glass Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ray of light incident on a glass sphere with a refractive index of sqrt 3, which experiences total internal reflection before emerging parallel to the incident ray. Participants are exploring the relationship between the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between angles in the context of total internal reflection and question the reasoning behind specific angle relationships in the geometry of the situation.

Discussion Status

Some participants are seeking clarification on the geometric relationships, particularly regarding why certain angles are equal in the isosceles triangle formed by the radii of the sphere. There is acknowledgment of common misunderstandings, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and are encouraged to explore different approaches without providing direct solutions. The geometry of the situation, particularly the isosceles triangle, is a focal point of discussion.

betaleonis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ray of light incident on a glass sphere (refractive index sqrt 3) suffers total internal reflection before emerging out exactly parallel to the incident ray. What was the angle of incidence?

μ = refractive index of the glass sphere, i = angle of incidence, r = angle of refraction

Homework Equations



μ = sin i/sinr

The Attempt at a Solution



From the figure, it turns out that < AOE = i (since L1 is parallel to L2, the corresponding angles are equal)

i = 2r, which implies that sin i/ sinr = μ, or 2cosr = μ, or r = 30° and i = 60°, which is the answer.

I do not understand why < ABO = r. Why is it so? It'd be helpful if I someone could come up with a different way of approaching the problem.
 

Attachments

  • physics0002.jpg
    physics0002.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 608
Physics news on Phys.org
betaleonis said:
I do not understand why < ABO = r. Why is it so?
Isosceles triangle (two radii).
 
I do not understand why < ABO = r. Why is it so? It'd be helpful if I someone could come up with a different way of approaching the problem.
ΔABO is an isosceles triangle: |OA|=|OB|

[edit] beaten to it :)
 
Oops! I ought to have thought a bit more before posting that question. Thank you. :)
 
No worries. Everyone does it sometimes :)
You'd probably have noticed right away if the diagram was constructed rather than sketched, even though you noticed about the equal base-angles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K