Maximum Angular velocity possible

Click For Summary
The maximum angular velocity of a rigid body is theoretically limited by the speed of light divided by the maximum perpendicular distance from the rotation axis, expressed as c/r. However, practical limits arise due to material constraints, as bodies will fail at much lower angular velocities than this theoretical maximum. The angular velocity depends on the body's mass distribution and tensile strength, with examples like a 1-meter steel rod potentially reaching around 300 rad/s before structural failure. Unlike translational motion, there is no fixed limit for angular velocity, as rigid bodies do not exist in reality, and the concept of perfect rigidity is an abstraction. The discussion also touches on the implications of angular motion in relativistic physics, highlighting the complexities of rigid body dynamics.
khil_phys
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
What it the maximum angular velocity that can possibly be attained by a rigid body?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm tempted to say c/r in which c is the speed of light and r is the maximum perpendicular distance from points on the body to the rotation axis. In practice the body will fly apart at a far lower angular velocity. To calculate it you'd need to know the body's mass distribution and the ultimate tensile stress of its material. To get some idea of the order of magnitude you could consider the easy case of a thin rod rotated about an axis through one of its ends and perpendicular to the rod. I make it about 300 rad per second for a steel rod 1 metre long.
 
Iranian engineers know the angular speed at which a rigid body explodes.
 
Philip Wood said:
I'm tempted to say c/r in which c is the speed of light and r is the maximum perpendicular distance from points on the body to the rotation axis. In practice the body will fly apart at a far lower angular velocity.

This means that the value depends on the rotational inertia of the body. Why is it that there is no fixed limit for the angular velocity for any body, like there is c for translational motion?

This sounds incredulous, but if I have a photon that can rotate about a fixed given axis, how fast would it rotate?
 
These are deep waters...
 
khil_phys said:
Why is it that there is no fixed limit for the angular velocity for any body, like there is c for translational motion?
First off, why should there be?

That said, there is a problem with a rigid body in Newtonian mechanics in relativistic physics. A perfectly rigid body necessarily has an infinite speed of sound. The resolution is simple: There is no such thing as a perfectly rigid body in reality. It is a useful abstraction that is approximately valid at low rotation speeds, where "low" means the velocity at every point on the body relative to the center of mass is much, much smaller than speed of light.


This sounds incredulous, but if I have a photon that can rotate about a fixed given axis, how fast would it rotate?
Elementary particles are point masses.
 
D H said:
First off, why should there be?

On the flip side, why should there not be?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K