Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Maximum Angular velocity possible

  1. Jan 2, 2012 #1
    What it the maximum angular velocity that can possibly be attained by a rigid body?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 2, 2012 #2

    Philip Wood

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I'm tempted to say c/r in which c is the speed of light and r is the maximum perpendicular distance from points on the body to the rotation axis. In practice the body will fly apart at a far lower angular velocity. To calculate it you'd need to know the body's mass distribution and the ultimate tensile stress of its material. To get some idea of the order of magnitude you could consider the easy case of a thin rod rotated about an axis through one of its ends and perpendicular to the rod. I make it about 300 rad per second for a steel rod 1 metre long.
  4. Jan 2, 2012 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Iranian engineers know the angular speed at which a rigid body explodes.
  5. Jan 3, 2012 #4
    This means that the value depends on the rotational inertia of the body. Why is it that there is no fixed limit for the angular velocity for any body, like there is c for translational motion?

    This sounds incredulous, but if I have a photon that can rotate about a fixed given axis, how fast would it rotate?
  6. Jan 3, 2012 #5

    Philip Wood

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    These are deep waters...
  7. Jan 3, 2012 #6

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    First off, why should there be?

    That said, there is a problem with a rigid body in Newtonian mechanics in relativistic physics. A perfectly rigid body necessarily has an infinite speed of sound. The resolution is simple: There is no such thing as a perfectly rigid body in reality. It is a useful abstraction that is approximately valid at low rotation speeds, where "low" means the velocity at every point on the body relative to the center of mass is much, much smaller than speed of light.

    Elementary particles are point masses.
  8. Jan 3, 2012 #7
    On the flip side, why should there not be?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook