Maximum average power for a purely resistive load

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum average power delivered to a purely resistive load in a circuit with a given resistance of 46Ω and an impedance of j14Ω. The correct maximum power is determined to be 2.95 W, achieved by accurately calculating the Thevenin voltage (VOC = 35V) and using the appropriate equations for current and power. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly identifying the Thevenin equivalent impedance and voltage to solve the problem effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Thevenin's Theorem
  • Complex impedance calculations
  • Power calculations in AC circuits
  • Voltage divider rule for AC circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Thevenin's Theorem applications in AC circuits
  • Learn about complex impedance and its role in power calculations
  • Explore the voltage divider rule for reactive components
  • Investigate maximum power transfer theorem for resistive loads
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals working with AC circuits who need to understand power delivery in resistive loads.

zealeth
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the circuit shown in the figure below. Suppose that R = 46Ω and Z=j14Ω. Determine the maximum average power that can be delivered to the load if the load is pure resistance. Note that the voltage source magnitude is given as Vmax, not VRMS

Steif.ch06.p64_1.jpg


Homework Equations



j = \sqrt{-1}
V=IZ
I1 = \frac{R_2*I_s}{R_1+R_2}
Zt = Thevenin equivalent impedance = VOC/ISC
P = IRMS2*RL
Power is max when RL = Rs, or ZL = Zs*
Z* = complex conjugate of Z

The Attempt at a Solution



Shorting the voltage source to find the thevenin equivalents, I combine the capacitor and inductor in parallel then combine that value with the resistor:

\frac{(-j10)(j14)}{-j10+j14} = -j35
-j35+46 = 46-j35 = Zt

Going back to the original circuit and replacing the load resistance with a short circuit to find ISC:

Current across capacitor = \frac{10}{-j10} = j
Using the current divider to find the current across the 46Ω resistor,
ISC = \frac{j14*(j)}{j14+46} = -0.278+j*0.8477

Vt = ISC*Zt = (-0.278+j*0.0848)(46-j35) = -9.82+j13.63

For max power, RL = |Zt| = |46-j35| = sqrt(46^2+35^2) = 57.8

The current through the thevenin equivalent circuit with RL attached is:

I = \frac{-9.82+j13.63}{46-j35+57.8} = -0.125+j*0.0893
IRMS = \sqrt{0.125^2+0.0893^2}/\sqrt{2} = 0.1086

P = IRMS2*RL = 0.682 W which is incorrect. The correct answer is 2.95 W. Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Thevenin impedance looks good, but I'm not liking your Thevenin voltage or the short circuit current. How did you conclude that the voltage across the capacitor is j when ZL is replaced by a short? Shorting RL places the resistor R in parallel with the inductor, it doesn't ground the top of the R.
 
Thanks for the reply.

gneill said:
Your Thevenin impedance looks good, but I'm not liking your Thevenin voltage or the short circuit current.

Sorry, I meant to say that was the *current* across the capacitor, not the voltage.

gneill said:
Shorting RL places the resistor R in parallel with the inductor, it doesn't ground the top of the R.

So now repeating the same method starting from ISC while combining R and Z:

R||Z = 46*j14/(46+j14) = 3.9+j12.8
R||Z + C = 3.9+j12.8 -j10 = 3.9+j2.8
ISC = V/R = 10/(3.9+j2.8) = 1.692-j1.215
Vt = ISC*Zt = (1.692-j1.215)(46-35j) = 35.31-j115.1
RL is still 57.8
Current through Thevenin equiv. circuit with RL = I = (35.31-j115.1)/(46-j35+57.8) = 0.641-j*0.893
IRMS = sqrt(0.641^2+0.893^2)/sqrt(2) = 0.777
P = 0.777^2*57.8 = 34.9W which is still incorrect.
 
Isc will be just the current through the resistor. You've taken it to be the total current produced by the source voltage driving the total impedance.

If I may suggest, since you've found the Thevenin Impedance easily enough (and it is correct), why not find the Thevenin Voltage as the open circuit voltage rather than by way of the short circuit current and impedance? With the load removed, the open circuit voltage at the terminals is the result of the action of the voltage divider created by the capacitor and inductor. Easy!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
gneill said:
Isc will be just the current through the resistor. You've taken it to be the total current produced by the source voltage driving the total impedance.

Isn't that what I did the first time, just with the mistake of me writing voltage instead of current?

gneill said:
If I may suggest, since you've found the Thevenin Impedance easily enough (and it is correct), why not find the Thevenin Voltage as the open circuit voltage rather than by way of the short circuit current and impedance? With the load removed, the open circuit voltage at the terminals is the result of the action of the voltage divider created by the capacitor and inductor. Easy!

Just tried that, VOC = 35V which when plugged into the following equations gives me the right answer. However, I've noticed that this is very close to the real part of the Vt value I obtained in my first reply to you. Since it's asking for a purely resistive power, was I supposed to take just the real part of that voltage or is that just a coincidence that the values are similar? Nonetheless, thank you very much for your help.
 
zealeth said:
Isn't that what I did the first time, just with the mistake of me writing voltage instead of current?
I don't think so. The source will see a total impedance of ZC + (Z||R), while you wrote that the capacitor current is 10/(-10j). That would only be true of the capacitor alone was across the source.

Just tried that, VOC = 35V which when plugged into the following equations gives me the right answer. However, I've noticed that this is very close to the real part of the Vt value I obtained in my first reply to you. Since it's asking for a purely resistive power, was I supposed to take just the real part of that voltage or is that just a coincidence that the values are similar? Nonetheless, thank you very much for your help.

I think that's a coincidence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
zealeth said:
...Just tried that, VOC = 35V which when plugged into the following equations gives me the right answer...
Because it is 35\,V:
V_t=V_{oc}=10\cdot\frac{14j}{14j-10j}=35
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K