Maximum Distance of Package on Incline with Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a package projected up an incline at an angle of 21 degrees with an initial velocity of 9 m/s, considering the effects of friction with a coefficient of 0.2. The goal is to determine the maximum distance the package will slide up the incline.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy theorem and the challenges posed by missing variables such as mass and height. There are questions about how to handle these unknowns in the context of energy conservation and friction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on formulating an energy conservation equation and suggested that mass may cancel out in the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, and while one participant has presented a calculation, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain variables and express concerns about the implications of these missing elements on the calculations. There is also a mention of the importance of notation in presenting the final result.

Shhtory
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A package is projected up a an incline of 21 degrees with respect to the horizontal, with an initial velocity of 9 m/s. The coefficient of friction between the package and the slope is 0.2. Determine the maximum distance the package will slide up the incline.

Sorry guys I'm just really stuck on this question so if anyone could help me out it would be great! Thanks guys in advance! :-) xx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Shhtory! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Use the work energy theorem … change in (mechanical) energy = work done :wink:
 
Thanks Tiny-tim!

But since I don't have mass, height or force, how am I supposed to calculate work or mechanical energy? Is there too many unknowns or am I just not reading the question properly?

I know this make me look stupid but I just can't get my head around it! Thanks very much for your help though tiny-tim :p xxx
 
You should find that (eventually) the mass variable will cancel out. Try writing an energy conservation equation for the package in terms of the distance along the slope. Don't forget the work done by the frictional force.
 
yup! … just call the mass "m" :biggrin:

show us what you get :smile:
 
Thanks gneill! I think I got it now,

I used the formula (-cos21)(0.2)s=(Sin21)s-((9^2)/(2g)) = 7.573m

Hope its right, thanks 4 all ur help guy! xx
 
The result is okay. Your equation notation leaves something to be desired, however! I think that the last "= 7.573m" should be something more like "==> s = 7.573m". I only mention this because it would be a shame to lose marks on an exam or hand-in homework due to sloppy notation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K