Maximum extension of the spring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the maximum extension of a spring under a constant force F, with participants debating whether the correct answer is F/k or 2F/k. The consensus is that the book's answer of F/k is correct for the static equilibrium position, while the maximum extension should indeed be interpreted as 2F/k when considering dynamic scenarios. The work-energy theorem supports this conclusion, indicating that the phrasing of the question may have led to confusion regarding static versus dynamic conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law (F = kx)
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Basic knowledge of simple harmonic motion (SHM)
  • Ability to analyze static versus dynamic systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Hooke's Law in dynamic systems
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem in the context of oscillatory motion
  • Explore the differences between static and dynamic equilibrium in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the characteristics of simple harmonic motion (SHM) and its equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of spring dynamics and oscillatory motion.

Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


spring1.png

Ans) F/k

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Consider only figure a) .

I believe the given answer is wrong . The maximum extension should be 2F/k . F/k is the extension in the spring in the equilibrium position . Maximum extension should be double of that .

Work energy theorem also gives maximum extension to be 2F/k .

But the answer given is F/k .The book answers are mostly correct .

Is book answer correct ?
 

Attachments

  • spring1.png
    spring1.png
    30 KB · Views: 4,239
Physics news on Phys.org
Jahnavi said:
F/k is the extension in the spring in the equilibrium position . Maximum extension should be double of that
How do you come to that conclusion ?
 
Jahnavi said:
Work energy theorem also gives maximum extension to be 2F/k
SAme question: how do you calculate that ?

I do agree that the question is phrased a bit unclear -- in this case, they refer to the static situation, not the dynamic situation you would get when a mass hangs from an unstretched spring and is left to drop suddenly.
 
Consider this: In (a), what force does the wall exert on the spring? Now compare that to (b).
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi and Delta2
Doc Al said:
Consider this: In (a), what force does the wall exert on the spring? Now compare that to (b).

I am considering only figure a) .Please ignore fig b) .

Is the book answer F/k correct for figure a) ?
 
Yes
 
BvU said:
Yes

When the block is in equilibrium then F=kx .This gives x=F/k . But the question is asking for maximum extension .

BvU said:
in this case, they refer to the static situation, not the dynamic situation you would get when a mass hangs from an unstretched spring and is left to drop suddenly.

How can there be a static situation in this problem ? Please consider only figure a) .The block will perform SHM .

I am assuming a constant force F .
 
Jahnavi said:
I am considering only figure a) .Please ignore fig b) .
Don't do that. If you understand how the two figures compare, you'll understand why they both have the same answer.

Jahnavi said:
Is the book answer F/k correct for figure a) ?
Yes.
 
Jahnavi said:
How can there be a static situation in this problem ? Please consider only figure a) .The block will perform SHM .
I'm interpreting this as a static case. Everything shown at the equilibrium position. (As BvU said, the problem statement is a bit unclear.)

(What textbook is this from?)
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #10
Doc Al said:
I'm interpreting this as a static case. Everything shown at the equilibrium position.

What sense does it make to ask for "maximum extension" if this is a static case ?

I am interpreting this as if the spring is initially in the unstretched position and then a constant force F starts to act .
 
  • #11
Jahnavi said:
What sense does it make to ask for "maximum extension" if this is a static case .
Poorly worded, I will admit. (What's the complete problem with all parts?)

Jahnavi said:
I am interpreting this as if the spring is initially in the unstretched position and then a constant force F starts to act .
I interpret them as two situations where the masses are held in equilibrium by the applied force. (I assume they will then remove the applied forces and SHM will ensue.)

Would you at least agree that if you assumed that interpretation the book answer makes sense?
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #12
Doc Al said:
I interpret them as two situations where the masses are held in equilibrium by the applied force. (I assume they will then remove the applied forces and SHM will ensue.)

That's exactly what part b) of the question asks :smile: . Now I see your point .

Doc Al said:
Would you at least agree that if you assumed that interpretation the book answer makes sense?

Only if "maximum" word is removed from the question .The question should simply ask about the extension when the block is held in place by a force F .

Do you agree ?
 
  • #13
Jahnavi said:
That's exactly what part b) of the question asks :smile: . Now I see your point .
Good. :smile:

Jahnavi said:
Only if "maximum" word is removed from the question .The question should simply ask about the extension when the block is held in place by a force F .

Do you agree ?
I agree with you. Sloppy wording in part (a), but that's why you need to sometimes read (b) to make sense of (a).
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Consider this: In (a), what force does the wall exert on the spring? Now compare that to (b).

I find this interesting that the two figures are equivalent as far as the extension in the spring is concerned (same extension ) , but they have different time periods of oscillation .Time period of a) being √2 times that of b) .
 
  • #15
Jahnavi said:
I find this interesting that the two figures are equivalent as far as the extension in the spring is concerned (same extension ) , but they have different time periods of oscillation .Time period of a) being √2 times that of b) .
Yes, it is interesting. The simplest way (at least for me) is to think of where the stationary point is for SHM. In (a) it's at the end of the spring, but in (b) it's at the middle.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
  • #16
Thanks !
 
  • #17
Jahnavi said:
That's exactly what part b) of the question asks :smile: . Now I see your point .
So do us all a favor and state the FULL problem statement at a future occasion. Saves helpers guesswork -- guesswork that came out right in this case but can cause a lot of confudsion in others.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K