Maximum height of ball with changing acceleration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height of a projectile when considering the changing acceleration due to gravitational effects at varying distances from the Earth's center. Participants explore theoretical approaches and mathematical formulations relevant to this problem, including energy conservation principles and gravitational force equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the basic equation for maximum height, noting its limitations for large distances and changing acceleration.
  • Another participant questions the height from which the ball is fired, emphasizing that gravity does not change significantly until reaching high altitudes.
  • A participant suggests assuming a very high initial velocity, potentially a fraction of escape velocity, to explore the problem further.
  • Mathematical expressions for gravitational force and energy conservation are introduced, with one participant providing an integral approach to derive the maximum height based on initial velocity.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the mathematical layout and requests specific numerical substitutions to clarify the calculations.
  • A participant explains that the weight of the projectile does not affect the calculations and provides a specific numerical example to illustrate the derivation of the maximum height.
  • Further inquiries are made about rearranging equations to find initial velocity given other parameters, with a formula provided for this purpose.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to calculate maximum height under varying gravitational conditions, and multiple viewpoints and methods are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their mathematical skills, which may affect their understanding of the equations and concepts discussed. The discussion also highlights the dependence on specific assumptions regarding initial conditions and the context of the problem.

Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
5,964
Reaction score
727
I put basic on this because my maths skills are exactly that and I suspect the answer to this question will be fairly maths heavy.

I understand that the equation to calculate the maximum height of a projectile (ignoring wind resistance) is

Hmax = (Vf2 - Vi2)/2a

But this only works over small distances and doesn't take into account the change in acceleration due to being further away from the center of the mass the object is being fired from. I've tried to google this but I must be using silly search terms because the results aren't quite what I'm asking.

Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How the heck high is this ball being fired??

Gravity does not change appreciably at altitude from Earth until you get well past low orbit.
 
Yeah I know, for the sake of argument assume really, really high. The initial velocity could be a good fraction of escape velocity.
 
Last edited:
The force acting between to masses can be written as

F = G ⋅ m1 ⋅ m2 / r2

G ... constant (6.674 ⋅ 10-11 m3/(kg ⋅ s2)
m1 ... mass 1 (e.g. projectile)
m2 ... mass 2 (e.g. earth) (5.972 ⋅ 1024 kg)
r ... distance between the centres of mass of m1 & m2

Due to energy consistency (with v0 = initial velocity) →

m1 ⋅ v02 / 2 = ∫ [(G ⋅ m1 ⋅ m2 / r2) ⋅ dr]

integrating from r1 to r2 → v02 / 2 = G ⋅ m2 ⋅ (1 / r1 - 1 / r2)

If you start from the surface of the Earth r1 ≈ 6.37 ⋅ 106 m, plugging that in, you get r2
 
Thanks, I'm a little confused with the way it's laid out (basic maths knowledge). I don't get how to fill out the equation without knowing r2, do you mind swapping out the symbols for real figures? Let's say:

Cannonball weight = 1kg
Initial velocity = 10km/s
 
The weight of the cannon ball doesn't matter, but if the initial velocity v0 = 10 ⋅ 103 m / s

r2 = 1 / { (1 / r1) - [v02 / ( 2 ⋅ G ⋅ m2 ) ] }

r2 = 1 / { (1 / (6.37 ⋅ 106)) - [108 / ( 2 ⋅ 6.674 ⋅ 10-11 ⋅ 5.972 ⋅ 1024 ) ] } = 31,708 ⋅ 103 m

That's the distance from the Earth's centre of mass, so you have to substract the radius: 31,708 ⋅ 103 - 6,370 ⋅ 103 = 25,338 ⋅ 103 m → about 25300 km above Earth surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt and Ryan_m_b
Awesome :) thanks
 
Ryan_m_b said:
I put basic on this because my maths skills are exactly that and I suspect the answer to this question will be fairly maths heavy.

I understand that the equation to calculate the maximum height of a projectile (ignoring wind resistance) is

Hmax = (Vf2 - Vi2)/2a

But this only works over small distances and doesn't take into account the change in acceleration due to being further away from the center of the mass the object is being fired from. I've tried to google this but I must be using silly search terms because the results aren't quite what I'm asking.

Any help would be appreciated :)

For large distances and velocities, you could equate total energy,, kinetic and potential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
One more thing :) I've had a go at rearranging the equation but again, maths skills. How would this example work if instead of the initial velocity you had everything else? In other words you knew the and the radius of Earth and were told that an object reached a height of X, how would you work out he initial velocity?
 
  • #10
Ryan_m_b said:
One more thing :) I've had a go at rearranging the equation but again, maths skills. How would this example work if instead of the initial velocity you had everything else? In other words you knew the and the radius of Earth and were told that an object reached a height of X, how would you work out he initial velocity?

v0 = SQRT[2 ⋅ G ⋅ m2 ⋅ (1 / r1 - 1 / r2)]

But you must not forget to add the radius of the Earth to the heights above the surface,

so r1 = 6.37 ⋅ 106 m (if started from the Earth surface)
and r2 = h + 6.37 ⋅ 106 m (if h = height above surface in m)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K