Maximum height reached by object released from a vertical spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass placed on a vertical spring, which is pushed downwards and released. Participants are exploring the maximum height the mass can reach after being released, focusing on the conservation of energy principles involving elastic potential energy (EPE) and gravitational potential energy (GPE).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two methods for calculating the maximum height, one based on conservation of energy and the other involving dynamics of motion after losing contact with the spring. Questions arise about the treatment of energy types and the implications of assumptions made regarding the spring's mass and the role of gravity.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions underlying each method, particularly regarding energy conservation. Some participants express confusion about the apparent discrepancy in energy loss between the two methods and seek clarification on the states being compared in the energy analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of defining the zero point for potential energy and the effects of pushing the mass down before release. There is a focus on the conditions under which energy conservation can be applied, particularly in relation to the spring's behavior and the gravitational force acting on the mass.

Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
Mentor Note: thread moved, therefore no template
A mass m is placed on a vertical spring and allowed to reach equilibrium, whose level is ##e_0## below the original level of the spring before placing the mass. It is then pushed downwards such that it is now a distance ##x_0## below the equilibrium level. What is the maximum height d from the level of release it can reach?

Method 1
By conservation of energy, loss in elastic potential energy (EPE) = gain in gravitational potential energy (GPE).
$$\frac{1}{2}k(e_0+x_0)^2=mgd$$
$$d=\frac{k(e_0+x_0)^2}{2mg}$$

Method 2
After release, the mass moves upwards and loses contact with the spring at a level distance x above the equilibrium level. At the point where contact is lost, ##a=g=\omega^2x##, where ##\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}##, since it is in simple harmonic motion.
And velocity $$v=\omega\sqrt{x_0^2-x^2}$$
By conservation of energy, loss in kinetic energy (KE) = gain in gravitational potential energy.
##\frac{1}{2}mv^2=mgh##, where h is the distance from the point where contact is lost to the maximum point. Making h the subject and substituting v from the equation above and ##x=\frac{g}{\omega^2}##, $$h=\frac{\omega^2x_0^2}{2g}-\frac{g}{2\omega^2}$$
$$d=h+x+x_0=\frac{\omega^2x_0^2}{2g}+\frac{g}{2\omega^2}+x_0=\frac{kx_0^2}{2mg}+\frac{mg}{2k}+x_0$$

It can be shown that the two answers are the same. My question is just before contact is lost, the mass has EPE, KE and GPE, but just after contact is lost, it only has KE and GPE, so where does the EPE go to? EPE isn't included in the calculation of h in method 2 (in the step where conservation of energy is used). So it seems like the mass loses some energy (equal to the EPE) after it loses contact. So I would expect method 2's answer to be smaller than method 1's, where no such loss in energy is used.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In taking the zero point for the spring potential energy at x0, you are implicitly removing gravity from the situation. Instead of considering a mass at equilibrium with a stressed spring plus gravity, you are considering an equivalent situation with a mass at rest at x0 connected to an unstressed spring with no gravity. That is an excellent simplification.

Solution 1 complicates the simplification by re-injecting gravity. That's erroneous.
 
jbriggs444 said:
In taking the zero point for the spring potential energy at x0, you are implicitly removing gravity from the situation. Instead of considering a mass at equilibrium with a stressed spring plus gravity, you are considering an equivalent situation with a mass at rest at x0 connected to an unstressed spring with no gravity. That is an excellent simplification.

Solution 1 complicates the simplification by re-injecting gravity. That's erroneous.

I have edited solution 1. Is it now correct?

I added a question in the last paragraph. How could the two method give the same answer when one involves a loss of EPE and the other doesn't?
 
Last edited:
You have modified the original post. Let me see if I can agree with the updated equations.
Happiness said:
A mass m is placed on a vertical spring and allowed to reach equilibrium, whose level is ##e_0## below the original level of the spring before placing the mass. It is then pushed downwards such that it is now a distance ##x_0## below the equilibrium level. What is the maximum height d from the level of release it can reach?

Method 1
By conservation of energy, loss in elastic potential energy (EPE) = gain in gravitational potential energy (GPE).
$$\frac{1}{2}k(e_0+x_0)^2=mgd$$
$$d=\frac{k(e_0+x_0)^2}{2mg}$$
Slow down and back up. What is the left hand side of that first equation supposed to represent? What is the right hand side of the first equation supposed to represent? What justification do you have for assuming conservation of energy between the two represented states?
 
jbriggs444 said:
You have modified the original post. Let me see if I can agree with the updated equations.

Slow down and back up. What is the left hand side of that first equation supposed to represent? What is the right hand side of the first equation supposed to represent? What justification do you have for assuming conservation of energy between the two represented states?

Since there is only EPE at first (just before release) and only GPE in the end (at the maximum height), the left hand side is loss in EPE and right hand side is gain in GPE. I assume the spring is massless, so it cannot have any energy at the final state.
 
I think I have found my misconception. There is no loss of EPE in method 2 too.
 
Happiness said:
Since there is only EPE at first (just before release) and only GPE in the end (at the maximum height), the left hand side is loss in EPE and right hand side is gain in GPE. I assume the spring is massless, so it cannot have any energy at the final state.
That does not answer the first two questions I asked. What two states are you comparing and asserting have equal energies?

As for the third (is energy conserved), look at the problem statement:
Happiness said:
It is then pushed downwards
Does that not pose a problem for a conservation of energy analysis?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K