Maximum Kinetic Energy of a Particle with Force F = F0e^(–kx)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiowaviator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle moving along the x-axis under the influence of a force described by the equation F = F0e^(–kx). The particle is released from rest at x = 0, and the goal is to determine the maximum kinetic energy it can attain using the Work-Kinetic Energy theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Work-Kinetic Energy theorem and the evaluation of the integral for work done by the force. There are questions about the behavior of the exponential function as x approaches infinity and its implications for the integral's evaluation.

Discussion Status

The discussion appears to be progressing with participants clarifying their understanding of the integral and its limits. Some guidance has been provided regarding the evaluation of terms in the integral, and there is acknowledgment of a clearer path forward in the reasoning process.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the calculus involved in the problem, specifically focusing on the integration of an exponential function and its limits. There is an emphasis on ensuring the correct interpretation of terms within the context of the Work-Kinetic Energy theorem.

kiowaviator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This question is whooping me. I know I have the calculus part right I just don't know where to go from here?

A particle moving along the x-axis is acted upon by a single force F = F0e^(–kx), where F0 and k are constants. The particle is released from rest at x = 0. It will attain a maximum kinetic energy of

F0/k
F0/e^(k)
kF0
1/2(kF0)^2
ke^(k)F0

So using the Work Kinetic Energy theorem
W=Kf-Ki since x=0 then Kf=W

W=integral(F = F0e^(–kx),x,0,xf)
taking F0 out, since its a constant, and integrating the exponential function I get
W=F0[-e^(-kxf)/k + 1/k]

now what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you evaluate the integral one of the terms is zero,

exp(-x) goes to zero as x goes to infinity?
 
I did that, that's why the second term inside the brackets is 1/k, since e^(-k*0)=1.
 
You've pretty much done it now. So you now have 1/k inside the bracket and f0 outside the bracket, so just multiply them together to get the answer.
 
Ok, that makes sense. I was there I just couldn't see it. Thanks all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K