Maximum likelihood estimator of mean difference

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
safina
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sample of size n[tex]_{1}[/tex] is to be drawn from a normal population with mean [tex]\mu_{1}[/tex] and variance [tex]\sigma^{2}_{1}[/tex]. A second sample of size n[tex]_{2}[/tex] is to be drawn from a normal population with mean [tex]\mu_{2}[/tex] and variance [tex]\sigma^{2}_{2}[/tex]. What is the maximum likelihood estimator of [tex]\theta[/tex] = [tex]\mu_{1}[/tex] - [tex]\mu_{2}[/tex]?

If we assume that the total sample size n = n[tex]_{1}[/tex] + n[tex]_{2}[/tex] is fixed, how should the n observations be divided between the two populations in order to minimize the variance of the maximum likelihood estimator of [tex]\theta[/tex]?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
so if we denote the samples from distribution 1, xi, and the samples from distribution 2, yj, then let call the samples
[tex]\textbf{x} = (x_1,.., x_i,..)[/tex]
[tex]\textbf{y} = (x_1,.., y_j,..)[/tex]

i'd start by trying to find the distribution likelihood of the data given the sample parameters

[tex]L(\textbf{x}, \textbf{y} | \mu_1, \sigma_1, \mu_2, \sigma_2)[/tex]

then consider differntiating ln(L) w.r.t. theta

(I haven't tried this, but its how i'd try and get started)
 
Last edited:
also are any of the parameters known beforehand? if all are unknown as they are not independent you could consider the set [itex]\left{\theta,\sigma_1,\mu_2, \sigma_2 \right}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
And one more let, t, m1, m2 be the estimators for theta, mu1 and mu2

Due to the independence, it shouldn't be too hard to convince yourself the MLE for t is
t=m1+m2

Now you should be able to come up with the sampling distribution for m1 and m2
P(m1,m2|mu1,mu2,sig1,sig2) and use that to find a sampling distribution for t, of which the variance should be apparent. Then minimize wrt the constraint
 
lanedance said:
also are any of the parameters known beforehand? if all are unknown as they are not independent you could consider the set [itex]\left{\theta,\sigma_1,\mu_2, \sigma_2 \right}[/itex]
None of the parameters are known beforehand.

I have a feeling that the MLE for t is m1-m2, but could you help me more what will be the form of the likelihood function?