Maximum Likelihood Estimator, Single Observation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) for the parameter t based on a single observation X with the density function f(x, θ) = 6x/(t^3)(t-x), where 0 < x < t. The likelihood function is simplified to L(t) = 6x/(t^3)(t-x) when considering a single observation. Participants clarify that the product notation is unnecessary for n=1, leading to the conclusion that the correct approach involves differentiating the log-likelihood function and solving the equation 3/t + 1/(t-x) = 0 for t.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)
  • Familiarity with likelihood functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Basic statistics concepts related to probability density functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Maximum Likelihood Estimators in statistical theory
  • Learn about the properties of likelihood functions and their applications
  • Explore techniques for solving equations involving parameters in denominators
  • Review examples of MLE with single observations in statistical literature
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and students studying statistical estimation methods who seek to deepen their understanding of Maximum Likelihood Estimation and its application to single observations.

bitty
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An observation X has density function: f(x,/theta)=6x/(t^3)*(t-x) where t is a parameter: 0<x<t.

Given the single observation X, determine the maximum likelihood estimator for t.


Homework Equations


Included below


The Attempt at a Solution

For a sample size of n, the likelihood function is
L(t)=product[6x_i/(t^3)*(t-x_i)] from i=1 to n.
To maximize a product, we take the log L[t] and differentiate with respect to t and equate to 0.

d/dt [Log[t]=3/t+Sum[1/(t-x_i)] for i=1 to n.
However, I don't know how to solve 3/t+Sum[1/(t-x_i)]=0 for t since there is a t on the denominator in the sum. Is there a way to do this?

Or have I misinterpreted the question? Since the question says, "Given a single observation X" am I not supposed to take the product over n samples but rather set n=1 when finding my likelihood function, which would then be L(t)=6x/(t^3)*(t-x) without a product?

*I accidentally posted this in the incorrect section (pre-Calc) so I apologize for the double post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you don't need the sum, i.e., n=1 indeed
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K