Maximum transverse velocity of a wave along a string

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum transverse velocity of a wave pulse traveling along a string. The wave pulse is traveling at a speed of 40 m/s with a wavelength of 2 meters, leading to a frequency of 20 Hz and an angular frequency of 40π. The initial calculations suggest a maximum velocity of 12.5 m/s, but the book states the answer is 4 m/s. The discrepancy arises from the nature of the wave pulse, which requires considering the slope of the wave function rather than treating it as a sinusoidal wave. The maximum transverse velocity is ultimately derived from the product of the wave speed and the maximum slope of the wave pulse.
warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure (attached image) shows a pulse on a string of length 100m with fixed ends. The pulse is traveling to the right without any change of shape, at a speed of 40 m/s.

What is the maximum transverse velocity of the string?

Homework Equations



y = A Sin(kx-wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



I said that the wave had a length of 2 meters. That makes the wave number 2pi/2 = pi. And since we know the velocity and wavelength, we can find the frequency, and therefore, the angular frequency. 40(m/s)/2m = 20 hz. w=2 pi f = 2 pi 20 = 40 pi. And the amplitude is .1 m.

This makes the equation y = .1 Sin(pi x - 40 pi t)

The velocity is the derivative of position, giving us -12.5 Cos[40 pi t - pi x].

Therefore, the maximum velocity would be when the derivative of velocity = 0.
y''=a= 1580 Sin[40 pi t - pi x].

I get that y'' = 0 when either x=40t or t=x/40. If I plug this into y', I get the argument in the cosine to equal 0, which makes cosine equal 1. This would just leave the constant term as the answer, making it (a magnitude of) 12.5 m/s. But according to the book, the answer is 4 m/s. How did they get this?
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    20.6 KB · Views: 1,647
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The graph shows a wave pulse, not a sinusoidal wave. The wave pulse would be represented by some function of the form ##y(x, t) = f(x-vt)##, where ##v## is the wave speed. It will be useful to think of this as

##y(x, t) = f(u)##, where ##u \equiv x - vt##

Note that at any fixed time ##t##, the slope of the wave pulse at position ##x## is given by

slope = ##\frac{\partial y}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}##.

Since ##\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 1##, we have slope = ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}##

Similarly, the vertical velocity ##V_y## of a point of the string at position ##x## is given by

##V_y = \frac{\partial y}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}##.

Since ##\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = -v##, we have ## V_y = -v \frac{\partial f}{\partial u}##.

Or, since ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial u} = ## slope, ## V_y = -v \cdot slope##.

You can use this to help sketch the graph of ## V_y## as a function of ##x## for the time shown in the figure.

To estimate the maximum value of ## V_y \,##, use the figure to estimate the maximum slope of the wave pulse.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
880
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K