Maximum work during reversible process?

AI Thread Summary
Maximum work is achieved during reversible processes, as demonstrated by comparing two scenarios of ideal gas expansion. In an irreversible process, the work done is greater than in a reversible process, as shown in the examples provided, where the absolute values of work differ significantly. The discussion also highlights the importance of using correct formulas for calculating work and heat absorbed during these processes. Additionally, there is a query regarding the accuracy of solutions to specific problems from NCERT textbooks, particularly concerning the calculations for reversible expansions. The conversation concludes with a question about whether maximum work during compression occurs under reversible or irreversible conditions.
adianadiadi
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
maximum work during reversible process?

I have seen maximum work is achievable when the process is carried out reversibly. Is it correct?

For example, if you look at the following problems,

1) Ten litres of an ideal gas at a pressure of 10 atm expands isothermally against a constant pressure of 1 atm until its total volume becomes 100 litres.The amount of heat absorbed in the expansion is

The answer is -90 L-atm
(I have used the formula w = -p(ext)*(v2-v1))

2) Ten litres of an ideal gas at a pressure of 10 atm expands isothermally under reversible conditions until the final volume becomes 100 litres.The amount of heat absorbed in the expansion is

The answer is -23.03 L-atm
(Here the formula used is w = -2.303*p(internal)*log v2/v1)

In the first problem, the process is irreversible and the process in second problem is reversible. Here the work done in case of irreversible process is greater than that in reversible process. (Just consider the absolute values and not the negative signs)

Could you please explain this? Am I wrong anywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi adianadiadi, welcome to PF. The second answer should be -230 L-atm:

\int -p\,dV=-nRT\int_{V_1}^{V_2} \frac{dV}{V}=-P_1V_1\ln 10=-230

Does this answer your question?
 


ThanQ very much Mapes! Now I got the answer.

If you have time, could you please tell me whether the solution given to the problem 6.4 is correct or not? I think this is wrong. It should be then, 32.2 L-atm.

These problems are given in NCERT textbooks.
http://www.ncert.nic.in/book_publishing/CLASS 11/Chemistry/Part I/6.pdf

Problem 6.2
Two litres of an ideal gas at a pressure of 10 atm expands isothermally into a vacuum until its total volume is 10 litres.How much heat is absorbed and how much work is done in the expansion ?
Solution
We have q = – w = pex (10 – 2) = 0(8) = 0
No work is done; no heat is absorbed.
Problem 6.3
Consider the same expansion, but this time against a constant external pressure of 1 atm.
Solution
We have q = – w = pex (8) = 8 litre-atm
Problem 6.4
Consider the same expansion, to a final volume of 10 litres conducted reversibly.
Solution
We have q = – w = 2.303 × 10 x log10/2 = 16.1 litre-atm


Thanking you once again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Looks good, but check 6.4 again.
 


In 6.4, the value 10 is just the pressure. I think we should also take initial volume 2 lit.

I got another doubt. Whether the work done during compression is maximum under reversible conditions or in irreversible conditions?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top