Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, the application of statistical mechanics to different types of particles is clarified. Fermi-Dirac statistics apply to indistinguishable fermions, while Bose-Einstein statistics are used for indistinguishable bosons. Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are appropriate for distinguishable classical particles. The confusion arises when considering systems with degeneracy and distinguishability, where it is established that Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are exact for distinguishable particles, despite the theoretical absence of such particles in nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Knowledge of Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Familiarity with Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics
  • Concept of particle distinguishability and degeneracy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Fermi-Dirac statistics in high-density fermionic systems
  • Explore Bose-Einstein condensation and its applications
  • Investigate the conditions under which Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics serve as an approximation
  • Review literature on the role of particle distinguishability in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum statistics.

Clau
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If we have indistinguishable particles, we must use Fermi-Dirac statistics.
To Identical and indistinguishable particles, we use Bose-Einstein statistics.
And, to distinguishable classical particles we use Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

I have a system of identical but distinguishable particles, where the second level has a degeneracy.

I was reading at Wikipedia: "Degenerate gases are gases composed of fermions that have a particular configuration which usually forms at high densities."

My question is: Should I use Fermi-Dirac statistics in this case?

I'm confused. I was reading Reif and it seems that I should use Maxwell-Boltzmann just to nondegenerate gases. But if my system is made by distinguishable particles, it seems that I should use MB statistics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert on this and if I'm making an error, please correct me. But I thought that distinguishability is the key element, which determines that one should use the MB statistics. The MB statistics is ALSO a good approximation to the other distributions in certain limiting cases (such as dilute media), but I thought that if we deal with distinguishable components, that MB was exact. (the problem being, of course, that there do not exist systems of distinguishable elementary particles in nature)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K