Maxwell relations Thermodynamics

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
thonwer
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that: [itex](\frac{∂T} {∂V})_S,_n=-(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n[/itex]

Homework Equations


[itex]dU=TdS-PdV+μdn[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\frac {∂} {∂S} (\frac{∂U} {∂V})_S,_n=-(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n[/itex]

[itex]\frac {∂} {∂V} (\frac{∂U} {∂S})_V,_n=(\frac{∂T} {∂V})_S,_n[/itex]

I tried to isolate T and P, but I get stuck:
[itex]TdS=dU+PdV[/itex]

[itex]-PdV=dU-TdS[/itex]

How can I demonstrate that they are equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
56b0cbc1364d99465ab99c356b72b756.png

3375c17ee49748749d0bbda7c686aaeb.png

d03b8dacd5d3667bd0eada2a8f3e4f69.png

d24d79423b8505bb6091bb80cb6f8fde.png
 
Yes I see that, but I ment to obtain [itex]−(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n[/itex] from [itex](\frac {∂T} {∂V})_S,_n[/itex] or viceversa, demonstrating Schwartz relation in some way.
 
If I say they are equal, I am assuming that Schwartz relation is valid in this case, or that U is a continuos function. I want to demonstrate why Schwartz relation is valid.
 
Nothing, but in an exam I would have to reason why I assume that U is continuous, so if I could go from [itex]-\left( {\frac{\partial P} {\partial S}}\right)_{V,n}[/itex] to [itex]\left( {\frac{\partial T} {\partial V}}\right)_{S,n}[/itex] by using derivatives and their properties, the problem would be solved I think.
 
I think it's continuous, I know from theory, but it's not a given in the problem, so if i use it, I have to say why. As I don't know how to justify that U is continuous, I think that, if I can demonstrate that Schwartz relation is valid, then, I can avoid justifying its continuity.
 
thonwer said:
I think it's continuous, I know from theory, but it's not a given in the problem, so if i use it, I have to say why. As I don't know how to justify that U is continuous, I think that, if I can demonstrate that Schwartz relation is valid, then, I can avoid justifying its continuity.
I don't know what to say. Are you a mathematician or a physicist? If the latter, why would you think that internal energy is not a continuous function of entropy and volume?

Chet
 
I'm studying Physics, and I know it is a continuous function of entropy and volume, but one thing is knowing and another is proving. I need to prove this knowledge.
 
Mmm statiscal thermo is a subject I will study next year, so if there's no other proof I suppose experimental proof is what I need.Thank you.