Maxwell relations Thermodynamics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating the Maxwell relation in thermodynamics, specifically the equation (\frac{∂T}{∂V})_S,_n = -(\frac{∂P}{∂S})_V,_n. Participants explore the implications of the continuity of internal energy (U) and the validity of Schwartz's relation. The conversation emphasizes the need for a rigorous justification of U's continuity when applying these thermodynamic principles. Ultimately, the consensus is that experimental evidence supports the continuity of U, which is essential for the application of these relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell relations in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their properties
  • Knowledge of internal energy (U) as a function of entropy (S) and volume (V)
  • Basic principles of statistical thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Maxwell relations in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the continuity of thermodynamic functions, specifically internal energy
  • Explore statistical thermodynamics to understand the foundations of thermodynamic properties
  • Investigate experimental methods for validating thermodynamic principles
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and its applications in physical systems. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Maxwell relations and the continuity of thermodynamic functions.

thonwer
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that: (\frac{∂T} {∂V})_S,_n=-(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n

Homework Equations


dU=TdS-PdV+μdn

The Attempt at a Solution


\frac {∂} {∂S} (\frac{∂U} {∂V})_S,_n=-(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n

\frac {∂} {∂V} (\frac{∂U} {∂S})_V,_n=(\frac{∂T} {∂V})_S,_n

I tried to isolate T and P, but I get stuck:
TdS=dU+PdV

-PdV=dU-TdS

How can I demonstrate that they are equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
56b0cbc1364d99465ab99c356b72b756.png

3375c17ee49748749d0bbda7c686aaeb.png

d03b8dacd5d3667bd0eada2a8f3e4f69.png

d24d79423b8505bb6091bb80cb6f8fde.png
 
It looks like you already had it in your first two equations of Attempt at a Solution. You are aware that 2nd partial derivatives with respect to two variables are interchangeable (commutative), correct?

Chet
 
Yes I see that, but I ment to obtain −(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n from (\frac {∂T} {∂V})_S,_n or viceversa, demonstrating Schwartz relation in some way.
 
thonwer said:
Yes I see that, but I ment to obtain −(\frac {∂P} {∂S})_V,_n from (\frac {∂T} {∂V})_S,_n or viceversa.
Isn't that what your first two equations under Attempt demonstrate?

Chet
 
If I say they are equal, I am assuming that Schwartz relation is valid in this case, or that U is a continuos function. I want to demonstrate why Schwartz relation is valid.
 
thonwer said:
If I say they are equal, I am assuming that Schwartz relation is valid in this case, or that U is a continuos function. I want to demonstrate why Schwartz relation is valid.
What's wrong with assuming that U is a continuous function for a single-component single-phase material?

Chet
 
Nothing, but in an exam I would have to reason why I assume that U is continuous, so if I could go from -\left( {\frac{\partial P} {\partial S}}\right)_{V,n} to \left( {\frac{\partial T} {\partial V}}\right)_{S,n} by using derivatives and their properties, the problem would be solved I think.
 
Why would you think it's not continuous?

Chet
 
  • #10
I think it's continuous, I know from theory, but it's not a given in the problem, so if i use it, I have to say why. As I don't know how to justify that U is continuous, I think that, if I can demonstrate that Schwartz relation is valid, then, I can avoid justifying its continuity.
 
  • #11
thonwer said:
I think it's continuous, I know from theory, but it's not a given in the problem, so if i use it, I have to say why. As I don't know how to justify that U is continuous, I think that, if I can demonstrate that Schwartz relation is valid, then, I can avoid justifying its continuity.
I don't know what to say. Are you a mathematician or a physicist? If the latter, why would you think that internal energy is not a continuous function of entropy and volume?

Chet
 
  • #12
I'm studying Physics, and I know it is a continuous function of entropy and volume, but one thing is knowing and another is proving. I need to prove this knowledge.
 
  • #13
thonwer said:
I'm studying Physics, and I know it is a continuous function of entropy and volume, but one thing is knowing and another is proving. I need to prove this knowledge.
It's observed experimentally. Does that count as proof? Otherwise you need to start looking into statistical thermo.

Chet
 
  • #14
Mmm statiscal thermo is a subject I will study next year, so if there's no other proof I suppose experimental proof is what I need.Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K