Maxwell's Equations: are they complete?

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's Equations consist of a set of equations that describe electromagnetic fields, but they are not complete as they leave one equation short when considering the scalar equations and unknowns involved. The continuity equation is derived from Maxwell's equations, indicating they are interdependent and complicating the specification of initial states for the system. A potential formulation using a scalar potential V and a vector potential A clarifies the degrees of freedom in the equations. This formulation introduces gauge freedom, allowing for different choices of V and A while still describing the same physical situation. Proper initial and boundary conditions, such as particle positions and velocities, are essential for solving the equations in practical scenarios.
chingkui
Messages
178
Reaction score
2
Maxwell's Equations:
\nabla \cdot D= \rho
\nabla \cdot B=0
\nabla \times E=- \partial B/ \partial t
\nabla \times H=J+ \partial D/ \partial t
Together with the continuity eq:
\nabla \cdot J=- \partial \rho / \partial t
There are 9 scalar equations and 16 scalar unknowns (B, E, D, H, J, \rho)
If we are supplied with the relations that relate B to H and E to D (e.g. a linear media relation):
D=f(E)
H=g(B)
we have 6 more scalar equations and therefore 15 equations in total. We are still one equation short of solving the Maxwell Eq, if we are supplied with appropriate B.C. and Initial Conditions, and we do not constrain the current density J and charge density \rho. In that case, how do we solve the Maxwell Equations?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
If you describe the EM field by its potentials V and \vec{A}
and the source field by the charge \rho and current \vec{J}

Then you need just eight equations:

\nabla \cdot D= \rho
\nabla \cdot B=0
\nabla \times E=- \partial B/ \partial t \ \ \ \ (=3x)
\nabla \times H=J+ \partial D/ \partial t \ \ \ \ (=3x)Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
The continuity equation is not an independent assumption, but follows from Maxwell's equations (apply the curl to the fourth). However, they form an interdependent set of equations, so it's not at all obvious from these equations what the degrees of freedom are, or how to specify the initial state of the system (the field and the particles).

To see the degrees of freedom more clearly, you should use a potential formulation. A statement of a potential function V and a vector potential \vec A will then be necessary and sufficient to give the field everywhere (you also need the positions and velocities of all the particles for the system ofcourse). The choice on V and \vec A is not unique though. There's some freedom of choice which we call gauge freedom.

For the Coulomb gauge, the initial condition you should specify are the positions and velocities of all particles, the field \vec A and its time derivative (since it obeys a wave equation).
 
There are boundary conditions that apply too, for example solving for a field within a waveguide.

Claude.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top