MDI's Compressed Air Technology Systems: C.A.T's ©(*).

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

MDI's Compressed Air Technology systems (C.A.T's ©) claim to provide pollution-free engines powered by compressed air. However, forum participants express skepticism regarding the efficiency and practicality of this technology, particularly questioning the feasibility of charging air tanks to 4,000 psi and achieving a 124-mile range at 60 MPH. Critics argue that electric vehicles, especially those utilizing advanced fuel cells, offer superior efficiency and environmental benefits compared to compressed air systems. Overall, the discussion highlights significant doubts about the viability and safety of MDI's compressed air technology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compressed air systems and their mechanics
  • Knowledge of electric vehicle technology and efficiency metrics
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics principles related to gas compression
  • Awareness of environmental impacts of different automotive technologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of compressed air vehicles versus electric vehicles
  • Explore advancements in fuel cell technology and their potential applications
  • Study the safety protocols for handling high-pressure air systems
  • Investigate the environmental impact of electricity generation for air compression
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, environmental scientists, and technology enthusiasts interested in alternative fuel systems and their implications for future transportation solutions.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
2,657
After ten years of research and development of pollution-free engines and cars powered by compressed air, MDI is proud to present:

Compressed Air Technology systems © : C.A.T's ©(*).

http://www.theaircar.com/howitworks.html

also: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/air-car1.htm

I haven't studied this yet but to me this seems an unlikely technology. This must be terribly inefficient. It even strikes me a bit as a scam - clean technology? Comments?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Given how long it takes a decent air compressor to charge a 60 gallon tank to 125psi going to 4,000psi should take far more than 4 hours and instead more like 4 days. And after meeting people damaged by exploding truck and tractor tires at a mere 90psi, or even unplugging an air hose and having it whip around kicking up dust, I would be hesitant to jump to using a 4,000 psi filling rig by hand.

Efficiencies and issues of generating, storing, and transferring the compressed air aside, this still seems very optimistic. 124 mile range at 60MPH that effectively puts it on a level playing field to the EV1?? My guess is that the energy density of the lead acid battery and efficiency of power conversion with an electric motor & controller should easily be able to beat this setup hands down.

Why don't we just all build a H2 fueled steam boiler? Can't imagine what rush hour would look like in the morning... :-)

Cliff
 
No, I agree that it does not sound like clean technology. It requires electricity to run the compressor (unless it is on a hydro electric or windmill system).

I don't see it getting that kind of range either.
 
And it is a pretty ugly car too!

I think electric cars have more potential, are more efficient, practical and perhaps even better from a environmental point of wiev, if good fuel cells are developed. However there must come something good out of this research too. Perhaps in a couple of years...
 
Unless I'm really missing sopmething, it looks like total BS.
Just do a simple compressed ideal gas energy conversion, this
thing certainly can't propel a car to any reasonable distance,
let alone 200 km. And if you compress the air using a chemical
engine then you've gained nothing and just got more efficiency
decrease of the whole thing, let alone converting chemical
energy into electricity and then into the compression energy.
French people... :biggrin:
 
That car is uglier than the Honda Element. And that's one ugly car. If you ask me feul cells are the wave of the future.
 
drag said:
Unless I'm really missing sopmething, it looks like total BS.

Note that the Thermodynamics and Mileage link doesn't work at the home page. http://www.theaircar.com/howitworks.html

It is getting plenty of press. I wonder if we aren't going to have a lot of egg on the faces of technical editors, sooner or later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
28K
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K