Mean and variance of loggamma distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The loggamma distribution is defined by the probability density function \( g(x) = \frac{1}{ \Gamma ( α) θ^{ α} } \frac{(ln( x))^{ α - 1}}{x^{1+\frac{1}{θ}}} \) for \( 1 < x < ∞ \), where α is a positive integer. To compute the mean and variance, a substitution \( u = ln(x) \) simplifies the integration process. By transforming the expectations \( E[X] \) and \( E[X^2] \) using this substitution, one can derive the mean and variance as constants multiplied by integrals that resemble the gamma distribution. This method effectively leverages the properties of gamma distributions to facilitate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of loggamma distribution and its probability density function.
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment-generating functions (mgf).
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly substitutions in integrals.
  • Basic principles of gamma distributions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the gamma distribution and its applications in statistics.
  • Learn about moment-generating functions and their role in finding moments of distributions.
  • Practice integration techniques involving substitutions, particularly in probability density functions.
  • Explore advanced topics in distribution theory, focusing on transformations and their implications.
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, mathematicians, and data scientists interested in advanced probability distributions and their statistical properties, particularly those working with the loggamma distribution and related calculations.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
The loggamma distribution is defined by
$$ g(x) = \frac{1}{ \Gamma ( α) θ^{ α} } \frac{(ln( x))^{ α - 1}}{x^{1+\frac{1}{θ}}} $$, for $$ 1 < x < ∞ $$

where α is a positive integer.
I've been trying to find the mean and variance of this distribution. It's been somewhat frustrating because the integral is rather difficult to compute, so I was thinking of using the moment-generating function to do this computation. However, the resulting expression seems very messy so I'm not sure it's the way to proceed.

Any suggestions for how I should go about this? Should I use the mgf or not?

Thanks.
BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Bipolarity.

If you use a substitution you should get u = ln(x) and du/dx = 1/x. This means integrating gives

= C*u^(alpha-1)*(1/(e^u)^(1/s))*1/x (C is a constant independent of the integration variable)
= C*u^(alpha-1)*e^(-u/s)*du

which has the same form as the normal gamma distribution PDF.

For expectations you just have to multiply by x before doing the substitution and this will give you (for E[X]) the following:

x*g(x) with substitution u = ln(x) gives a final integral of
= C*u^(alpha-1)*(1/(e^u)^(1/s - 1))*1/x
= C*u^(alpha-1)*e^(-u/(s-1))*du

Notice that the only thing that changes is the parameter within the exponential and this is of the gamma family of distributions.

If you do the same thing for E[X^2] you get

C*u^(alpha-1)*e^(-u/(s-2))*du since multiplying by x^2 will change the denominator of x^(1/s+1) to x^(1/s+1-2) = x^(1/s-1).

Using this you should be able to compute means and variances pretty easily using a trick where you pull a constant out of your integral and make sure that everything inside the integrand is just a density function for a particular set of values of a Gamma distribution. You evaluate this to one and whatever is left outside the integral (a constant not involving the integrand) is your mean or second moment.

It's very common to do this trick for these kinds of distributions (i.e. Gamma).
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K