Meaning of Expectation Values for <x^2> and <p^2> in Classical Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter 13characters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expectation
13characters
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Every quantum mechanical operator has an observable in classical mechanics

<x> - position
...
<x^2> - ?
<p^2> - ?

What is the meaning on these expectation values?

v^2 = <x^2> - <x>^2

What is the meaning of this? edit: It looks to me like uncertainty in position. Is it the average uncertainty in position?

Admin Please move me to the right forum, if I'm not in eet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
13characters said:
v^2 = <x^2> - <x>^2

This is the square of the uncertainty in position. That is,

\Delta x = \sqrt {&lt;x^2&gt; - &lt;x&gt;^2}
 
jtbell said:
This is the square of the uncertainty in position. That is,

\Delta x = \sqrt {&lt;x^2&gt; - &lt;x&gt;^2}

That's what i figures too after some digging in the kinetics section of my chem book

cheers.

i still don't get what <x^2> means. What i found was "the average of the square of molecular speeds" but i still don't entirely get why its operator is X^2.

edit: Also is there a ways to represent it geometrically or graphically
 
13characters said:
i still don't get what <x^2> means.

It's simply the average value of the square of the position, in the limit as the number of measurements goes to infinity. If you have N measurements of the position, then

&lt;x^2&gt; = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N {x_i^2}

Actually this is only an approximation. It becomes exact as N \rightarrow \infty.

The "average of the square of molecular speeds" would be &lt;v^2&gt;, calculated similarly, but with v replacing x.
 
jtbell said:
It's simply the average value of the square of the position, in the limit as the number of measurements goes to infinity. If you have N measurements of the position, then

&lt;x^2&gt; = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N {x_i^2}

Actually this is only an approximation. It becomes exact as N \rightarrow \infty.

The "average of the square of molecular speeds" would be &lt;v^2&gt;, calculated similarly, but with v replacing x.

i get it now.

thanks.
 
Last edited:
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top