Undergrad Meaning of the notations: ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{a}]##

Click For Summary
The notation ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{a}]## represents the set of all polynomials in ##\frac{1}{a}## with integer coefficients, derived from substituting ##x=\frac{1}{a}## in polynomials from ##\mathbb{Z}[x]##. Similarly, ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{6}]## is defined as the set of polynomials in ##\frac{1}{6}## with integer coefficients. The notation ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}]## extends this concept to include multiple variables, where ##x=\frac{1}{2}## and ##y=\frac{1}{3}## are substituted into polynomials from ##\mathbb{Z}[x,y]##. This framework allows for the construction of new algebraic structures by incorporating inverses of integers. Understanding these notations is essential for exploring the properties of these algebraic systems.
elias001
Messages
389
Reaction score
30
The following is taken from Abstract Algebra: A First Course by Stephen Lovett

Background

Exercise Let ##D=\{2^a 3^b\mid a,b,\mathbb{N}\}## as a subset of ##\mathbb{Z}##. Prove that ##D^{-1}\mathbb{Z}## is isomorphic to ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{6}]## even though ##D\neq\{1,6,6^2,\ldots\}##


Question:

I would like to know how is the notation: ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{6}]## or ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{a}]## defined? Also I have seen ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}]##, and I would like to know how that is also defined.


Thank you in advance.




Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1}{6}\right] are all polynomials in 1/6 with integer coefficients. It is what you get if you substitute x=1/6 in polynomials from \mathbb{Z}[x].

The same for \mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1}{a}\, , \,\frac{1}{3}\right]. Take \mathbb{Z}[x,y] and replace x=1/a and y=1/3.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
906
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
811
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
836