I Meaning of the notations: ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{a}]##

elias001
Messages
389
Reaction score
30
The following is taken from Abstract Algebra: A First Course by Stephen Lovett

Background

Exercise Let ##D=\{2^a 3^b\mid a,b,\mathbb{N}\}## as a subset of ##\mathbb{Z}##. Prove that ##D^{-1}\mathbb{Z}## is isomorphic to ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{6}]## even though ##D\neq\{1,6,6^2,\ldots\}##


Question:

I would like to know how is the notation: ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{6}]## or ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{a}]## defined? Also I have seen ##\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{3}]##, and I would like to know how that is also defined.


Thank you in advance.




Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1}{6}\right] are all polynomials in 1/6 with integer coefficients. It is what you get if you substitute x=1/6 in polynomials from \mathbb{Z}[x].

The same for \mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1}{a}\, , \,\frac{1}{3}\right]. Take \mathbb{Z}[x,y] and replace x=1/a and y=1/3.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
796
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
685
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
734