Measuring magnetic fields Will motors and metal frame interfere?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design considerations for a machine intended to move a Hall effect sensor through a magnetic field while minimizing interference from nearby motors and metal structures. Participants explore the potential impact of using DC or stepper motors and various materials on the accuracy of magnetic field measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that ferrous metals should be kept at least twice the distance from the test volume to avoid interference, recommending simulations for better estimates.
  • Another participant questions whether the distance of 30cm is sufficient, especially if measuring weak magnetic fields, indicating that the impact of nearby motors and materials could vary based on the field's magnitude and desired accuracy.
  • A different participant notes that while most magnetic flux stays within the motor, nearby structures can significantly affect measurements, particularly when measuring Earth's magnetic field.
  • One participant expresses intent to conduct experiments with various metals and motors, considering control runs without magnets to account for background fields.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of using two sensors for differential measurements and inquires about the existence of magnetic shielding materials.
  • A list of potential magnetic shielding materials is provided, including Mu Metal and supermalloy, among others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of minimizing interference from motors and metal structures, but there are differing views on the specifics of how far away these components should be and the effectiveness of various approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal design parameters and methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need for experimental validation and calculations, highlighting that assumptions about the magnetic field strength and measurement accuracy may influence design decisions.

engi845
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all, thanks for reading. I'm in the process of designing a machine that will move a hall effect sensor in 3 dimensions through a magnetic field and record readings. Before I started the design however, I wanted to see if there would be huge problems in how I envision this machine.

If I were to use medium sized dc or stepper motors ~30cm away from the test magnet and use aluminum or ss for the support structure, is this going to warp my magnetic field or cause too much noise? Would it be necessary to use as little metal as possible in this machine or move the motors as far away as possible? I basically want to design it so I'm dealing with as little noise as possible. I don't have many details on how machines like this operate so I'm mainly going off of how 3d printers function, I just don't want to make a huge mistake that will render the machine useless. Thanks for your time, I'd appreciate any input you guys have for me.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
engi845 said:
Hello all, thanks for reading. I'm in the process of designing a machine that will move a hall effect sensor in 3 dimensions through a magnetic field and record readings. Before I started the design however, I wanted to see if there would be huge problems in how I envision this machine.

If I were to use medium sized dc or stepper motors ~30cm away from the test magnet and use aluminum or ss for the support structure, is this going to warp my magnetic field or cause too much noise? Would it be necessary to use as little metal as possible in this machine or move the motors as far away as possible? I basically want to design it so I'm dealing with as little noise as possible. I don't have many details on how machines like this operate so I'm mainly going off of how 3d printers function, I just don't want to make a huge mistake that will render the machine useless. Thanks for your time, I'd appreciate any input you guys have for me.

Welcome to the PF.

Good questions! Yes, you need to keep ferrous metals away from your test volume. I'd initially estimate that you should keep ferrous metals at least 2x away from the test volume (2x each linear dimension). Simulations could provide a better estimate.
 
Doesn't it depend on the magnitude of the measurable fields and the accuracy desired? If what you are measuring is a very weak field, then a stepper motor 30cm away could be an issue. Or not. Same goes for ferrous materials. Some back of the envelope calculations (at least) are probably in order.
 
And some experiments.

Most of the flux stays in the motor
but if you are measuring Earth's field, nearby structures affect it more than you'd think.

Differential magnetometer (two sets of sensors separated by a few feet) can be quite sensitive. I built one that saw cars going down the street in front of my house, and knew whether refrigerator door was open or my kids had moved stereo speakers in next room.
 
Ok I agree, I will definitely be doing some experiments beforehand with comparable metals and motors. I do plan on testing fairly small magnets so I'm hoping I won't need to move the motors too far away to reduce noise. I also figured doing a control run before each test with no magnet would help with background fields.

Hm I never thought about using two sensors, that could be interesting. Does any type of magnetic shield material exist? Thanks for the input
 
Mu Metal Co-Netic, supermalloy, supermumetal, nilomag, sanbold, Molybdenum permalloy, Sendust, M-1040, Hipernom, HyMu-80 and Amumetal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
690
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K