Measuring one second with a bouncing ball

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical measurement of one second using a bouncing ball that reaches a height of 1.225 meters. Variations in bounce height, such as 1.13 meters resulting in 0.96 seconds and 1.32 meters yielding 1.04 seconds, indicate a +/-4% time variance. Factors affecting accuracy include the ball's departure from the ground, the specific point of measurement, and air resistance. While no specific experiments were cited, studies from 2015 and 2019 highlight the impact of air resistance, elasticity, temperature, and air pressure on bounce height and timing accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to motion and gravity
  • Familiarity with the concepts of elasticity and air resistance
  • Knowledge of high-speed camera technology for motion analysis
  • Awareness of experimental design and factors affecting measurement accuracy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of air resistance on bouncing balls in physics experiments
  • Explore high-speed camera techniques for capturing motion in experiments
  • Investigate the relationship between temperature, air pressure, and bounce height
  • Review studies on the elasticity of different materials used in ball manufacturing
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, experimental physicists, and students interested in practical applications of motion measurement and the effects of environmental factors on physical experiments.

thorpie
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello
Theoretically any ball that bounces 1.225 metres high is in the air for one second. This is fairly precise, +/-4% time variance is +/- 10 cm height variance, so bouncing to a height of 1.13 metres is 0.96 seconds and to a height of 1.32 is 1.04 seconds.
The theory is at least dependent upon identifying when he ball “leaves” the ground, which part of the ball is “at 1.225” metres high, and what size ball becomes measurably affected by air resistance.
Is anyone aware of any recorded experiments that quantify how long a second is, with various bouncing balls. There seem to be lots of discussion on bouncing balls and degradation of height bounced but nothing on measuring one second of time, and I cannot think of a simpler way to measure one second of time accurately from base.
Thank you for your time
Glenn
 
Science news on Phys.org
thorpie said:
Hello
Theoretically any ball that bounces 1.225 metres high is in the air for one second. This is fairly precise, +/-4% time variance is +/- 10 cm height variance, so bouncing to a height of 1.13 metres is 0.96 seconds and to a height of 1.32 is 1.04 seconds.
The theory is at least dependent upon identifying when he ball “leaves” the ground, which part of the ball is “at 1.225” metres high, and what size ball becomes measurably affected by air resistance.
Is anyone aware of any recorded experiments that quantify how long a second is, with various bouncing balls. There seem to be lots of discussion on bouncing balls and degradation of height bounced but nothing on measuring one second of time, and I cannot think of a simpler way to measure one second of time accurately from base.
Thank you for your time
Glenn
I'd recommend using a large steel ball bearing bouncing off of a thick steel plate. That will give you very little loss in the bounces, and a more accurate measure of what you want to show, IMO.
thorpie said:
I cannot think of a simpler way to measure one second of time accurately from base.
Base what?
 


Hi Glenn,

That's a really interesting question! I haven't come across any specific experiments that measure the duration of one second using bouncing balls, but I did find a few studies that may be relevant.

One study from 2015 used a high-speed camera to capture the motion of a bouncing ball and compared it to theoretical predictions. They found that the ball's motion was affected by factors such as air resistance and the elasticity of the ball, which could impact the accuracy of using a bouncing ball to measure time.

Another study from 2019 looked at the effect of temperature and air pressure on the bounce height of a ball. They found that these factors can also affect the accuracy of using a bouncing ball to measure time.

Overall, it seems like using a bouncing ball to measure one second of time may not be the most precise method. However, it could still be a fun and educational experiment to try! Perhaps using a high-speed camera and controlling for factors like air resistance and temperature could help improve the accuracy of the results.

I hope this helps and let me know if you come across any other interesting studies on this topic!

 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K