Measuring the Discharge Coefficients of a Rocket Injector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on measuring the discharge coefficients (Cd) of a liquid rocket injector using hydro-static tests. The user, Roy S., records pressure data from transducers PT-21 and PT-31 while varying injection pressures and flow rates. It is confirmed that the discharge coefficients should remain relatively constant for uniform fluids, but Roy observes variability in his results, particularly a low Cd of approximately 0.33 for the oxidizer line, which is deemed unusually low for a properly formed nozzle. The conversation emphasizes the importance of nozzle configuration and flow resistance in accurately determining discharge coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of liquid rocket injector design
  • Familiarity with hydro-static testing methods
  • Knowledge of pressure transducer operation and data recording
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics, specifically discharge coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of nozzle design on discharge coefficients
  • Learn about advanced hydro-static testing techniques for rocket components
  • Investigate methods for improving pressure transducer accuracy and response time
  • Explore the relationship between flow resistance and flow rate in piping systems
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, propulsion system designers, and researchers involved in liquid rocket engine testing and optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Roy S Ramirez
Messages
24
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
I build a feed system for a liquid rocket injector, ran water through it, measures pressures and flow rates, and I'm not sure how to calculate the pressure drops and discharge coeffs.
Hello everybody!

I hope you are all doing well. I built a liquid rocket injector and the following feed system:
244819
244820

I started to do hydro-static tests (cold flows) and a program I wrote records all the data for me (except for the flow rates which I measured experimentally by collecting the water with a bucket and measuring the volume*). I know the grad students at my school use this kind of data to measure discharge coefficients, and one of them told me that for the pressure drop across the injector you just use the difference between the injection pressure (which my program records), and the atmospheric pressure. I'm not sure if this true... This a a data sample, where green is the ox line and blue is the fuel line. Both lines were tested individually, and the values plotted are in PSIA vs time, where the pressure belongs to pressure transducers PT-21 and PT-31. It is interesting to note that the PT's spike up some seconds after opening the main valves (FC-21/FC-31) at t=4secs. Also note that PT-31 looks noisy, and this is because the device is defective but it still works fairly enough (it will be replaced).
244821

(A total of 10 individual tests were performed)
For the calculations we have the following:
244822

Here I vary the values of the injection pressures and the flow rates to get the Cd's. After plugging numbers I got:
244824
As you can see, the Cd's are varying with the injection pressure, and I thought they were supposed to be nearly fixed numbers. Also for the oxidizer line I think a Cd of 0.33 ish would be very low, wouldn't it?

Thank you very much,

Roy S.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The real determination of the Cd of the final flow nozzles is, assuming P21 and P31 are very near their nozzle inlets, are respectively P21 and P31 vs flow. Nozzles have a consistent Cd for uniform fluids; but, flow resistance through tubing/piping increases with flow rate.
Without seeing the nozzle configuration it is not possible to comment on the low Cd; but, yes a Cd = .33 would be considered very low for any reasonably formed nozzle.
 
Hello @JBA. I don't have a nozzle attached right now. I only have the injector, and yes, PT21 and PT31 are relatively close to it.
244904

(Cold flow at Zucrow Propulsion Lab two months ago)

PS: I manged to fix the response time issue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K