Measuring young's modulus from simple harmonic motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the formula for angular frequency in simple harmonic motion, specifically ω² = Exy³ / 4*M*L³, as applied to a cantilever beam experiment. The key equation mg = KS is introduced, where K is defined as Eb³*a/4L³, relating the applied force to the displacement of the center of mass. The participants emphasize the importance of treating the beam as a massless spring for accurate calculations, despite the complexities introduced by the beam's own mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with cantilever beam mechanics
  • Knowledge of solid deformation mechanics
  • Basic calculus for deriving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the cantilever beam displacement formula
  • Learn about the relationship between force and displacement in solid mechanics
  • Explore the principles of simple harmonic motion in greater detail
  • Investigate the assumptions made in modeling beams as massless springs
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in experimental mechanics or materials science seeking to understand the relationship between force, displacement, and oscillation in cantilever systems.

TheCapacitor
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was doing this experiment: http://practicalphysics.org/shm-cantilever.html

I'm interested in the derivation of the result ω^2 = Exy^3 / 4*M*L^3. I tried to think where it comes from.

5kG1D.gif
How do we even start to derive k from the equation mg = KS where S is the delta in the length of C.M before and after Mass was put on the edge and K is constant which is equal to Eb^3*a/4L^3?

Homework Equations


ω^2 = Exy^3 / 4*M*L^3

mg = KS where S is the delta in the length of C.M before and after Mass was put on the edge and K is constant which is equal to Eb^3*a/4L^3

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Let's say theta is small so sin(theta) is approximately theta. I tried to make moment of forces equation with point of turning at the place of force N, but it really don't make any sense as we get thetamgL/2 + MgLtheta = 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This result seems to neglect the mass of the ruler compared to the mass of the object taped to the ruler. They want you to treat the beam the same way you treat a massless spring.

What they are using is the equation, derived from solid deformation mechanics, for the downward displacement at the location were a force is applied to a cantilever beam as a function of the magnitude of the force. They don't want you to worry about where the equation came from.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K