Mechanical equivalents of electronic things?

In summary, there are many examples of mechanical equivalents of electronic devices, such as the mechanical TV and amplifier, Edison's phonograph, and music boxes using camshafts. Other examples include mechanical integrators for bomb sights and the generation of radio waves using an alternator. These mechanical technologies, while primitive, can still function in the event of an EMP attack or other electronic failures.
  • #1
Frenemy90210
Only recently, just 2-3 years ago, I discovered Mechanical TV, Mechanical amplifier. I was pleasantly surprised. Mechanical TV was invented by Beard. Mechanical amplifier uses air pump to amplify the sound, completely avoiding any electronics. Also, it seems there exists mechanical frequency filters such as low-pass filters or band pass filters. Edison's phonograph was a mechanical equivalent of today's audio-recording and player machine. Music box that employs camshaft also may be thought of as a mechanical equivalent of an music producing machine from ROM.
I was wondering are there any other such Mechanical equivalents of electronic devices ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • Like
Likes Klystron and davenn
  • #4
I remember an article about 1966 written by two engineers at GE.
The had built an "Electronic Digital Slide Rule" with Nixie tube readout .
It was awfully big by today's standards - they mounted it in a fishing tackle box which it filled completely.
It did four function arithmetic and transcendentals using rate multipliers which are electronic equivalent of gears.. So it was halfway between binary and analog computing.
They predicted it would be shirt pocket size within a decade. Seemed mighty far fetched at the time.
This is i believe their patent

upload_2017-10-11_23-20-8.png


Sure enough, by 1972 they were on the market.
 
  • Like
Likes PaulK2, scottdave and davenn
  • #5
Google up 'fluid logic' or 'fluidics' and 'MONIAC'.
 
  • #7
jim hardy said:
I remember an article about 1966 written by two engineers at GE.
The had built an "Electronic Digital Slide Rule" with Nixie tube readout .
It was awfully big by today's standards - they mounted it in a fishing tackle box which it filled completely.
It did four function arithmetic and transcendentals using rate multipliers which are electronic equivalent of gears.. So it was halfway between binary and analog computing.
They predicted it would be shirt pocket size within a decade. Seemed mighty far fetched at the time.
This is i believe their patent......
.

and the Chinese still like using an abacus :)
 
  • #8
davenn said:
and the Chinese still like using an abacus :)
Even in the banks, in Japan, they still use Abacus instead of calculators.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
  • #9
TINCAN_PHONE04.png

speaking-tube.jpg

d8345825c755a12f446664118ba6048d.jpg
Below, semaphore telegraph
220px-Rees%27s_Cyclopaedia_Chappe_telegraph.png


shadow-box-puppet.jpg

8_inch_glass_thermometer.jpg

This is fun. I could go on all day.

The OP should just ask, "What could civilization do before electronics?"
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Klystron, jim hardy and (deleted member)
  • #10
Here's a replacement for the digital piano keyboard and a way of storing your piano music for automatic playback.
pianos-new-player.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes PaulK2
  • #11
The WW II Norden bomb sight employed a mechanical integrator to project the ground impact point for release at any particular moment. IIRC, this was a ball and disk integrator.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and anorlunda
  • #13
I'd call those two "Capacitor" and "Insulation failure" :wideeyed:
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Tom.G and berkeman
  • #14
Frenemy90210 said:
Only recently, just 2-3 years ago, I discovered Mechanical TV, Mechanical amplifier. I was pleasantly surprised. Mechanical TV was invented by Beard. Mechanical amplifier uses air pump to amplify the sound, completely avoiding any electronics. Also, it seems there exists mechanical frequency filters such as low-pass filters or band pass filters. Edison's phonograph was a mechanical equivalent of today's audio-recording and player machine. Music box that employs camshaft also may be thought of as a mechanical equivalent of an music producing machine from ROM.
I was wondering are there any other such Mechanical equivalents of electronic devices ?
An interesting example is the generation of radio waves using an alternator. One such is still in existence at Grimeton, Sweden, and can deliver 200kW at 40kHz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varberg_Radio_Station
By the way, the correct name for the TV person is Baird. I met the man who built the first receiving unit for Baird.
 
  • #15
And that reminds me, what about the video recording which was done on 78rpm records? And how about the mechanical miracle of the video cassette recorder? And the teleprinter? Or the high definition, large screen TV display using an incredibly high speed mechanical scan made by Scophony in about 1938. It used an acoustic light modulator. And then there is the mechanical bombsight computer.
 
  • #16
Last edited:
  • #17
  • Like
Likes Klystron, jim hardy and anorlunda
  • #18
In the event of an EMP attack, all would do well to recall these "primitive technologies." They would still work after an EMP, but most of our electronic gadgets will be toast.
 
  • #19
tech99 said:
An interesting example is the generation of radio waves using an alternator. One such is still in existence at Grimeton, Sweden, and can deliver 200kW at 40kHz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varberg_Radio_Station
By the way, the correct name for the TV person is Baird. I met the man who built the first receiving unit for Baird.
To he honest, apart from the fact that the mechanical scanning system was good for describing the principles, the Baird system was hopeless as a broadcasting system. It needed an intermediate film stage and a further scanning of the developed film image. I think it was only xenophobia that forced the BBC to use it in parallel with the Marconi System when Marconi should have been used exclusively from the start.
 
  • #20
Dr.D said:
In the event of an EMP attack, all would do well to recall these "primitive technologies." They would still work after an EMP, but most of our electronic gadgets will be toast.

It doesn't have to be an attack. Lightning will do the job. EMP from a lightning strike once wiped out all the electronics on my sailboat.

That is why my self-steering uses this mechanical beast rather than the electronic autopilot shown below.
m24.jpg
ST2000%20Autopilot.jpg
 
  • #21
anorlunda said:
That is why my self-steering uses this mechanical beast rather than the electronic autopilot shown below.
Mechanical beats electronic at sea whenever possible. A wind generator won't supply enough to run an tiller pilot when you are running down wind for hours on end. Your mechanical system will always work if the sails will.
 
  • #22
Ah, the problem is even closer at hand than I had thought!
 
  • #23
anorlunda said:
It doesn't have to be an attack. Lightning will do the job. EMP from a lightning strike once wiped out all the electronics on my sailboat.

That is why my self-steering uses this mechanical beast rather than the electronic autopilot shown below.
View attachment 212929 View attachment 212930
And of course, the sextant allows navigation using Nature's "satellites" (just one really, the Moon, together with the Sun and 58 navigational stars).
Regarding Baird and television, he did demonstrate the first working system displaying half tones to Royal Society members in 1926, and broadcasts were made to the public by the BBC using the low definition 30 line system on borrowed AM transmitters from 1929 to 1932. Of course, later implementation was different, but so it is in many fields of innovation - Polio vaccination does not use the killed viruses of the original Salk vaccine, and we communicate without the sparks and coherers of Marconi. For a long time everyone's criticism was that Baird did not use a CRT, and a camera tube, but these are no longer part of television as we know it.
 
  • #24
Frenemy90210 said:
Only recently, just 2-3 years ago, I discovered Mechanical TV, Mechanical amplifier. ...

Check out: BOBCAT at http://www.tnmoc.org/news/notes-museum/plastic-flip-flops-1970s
 
  • #25
Dr.D said:
In the event of an EMP attack, all would do well to recall these "primitive technologies." They would still work after an EMP, but most of our electronic gadgets will be toast.

Actually if you read evidence based sources, EMP effects are pretty limited in degree and/or area. Since it's an inverse squared deal and requires a high altitude air burst to maximize coverage area, you don't actually get much bang for the buck (yes, I'm going to hell for that pun) out of EMP attacks.

It gets hyped by political fear mongers who routinely trot out the Hollywood exaggerations, but basically if the electronic device in question can withstand a nearby lightning strike, it's not likely to be phased by an EMP weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse_in_popular_culture

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...y-about-an-emp-attack/?utm_term=.ab268da1958c
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
  • #26
TheOldFart said:
Actually if you read evidence based sources, EMP effects are pretty limited in degree and/or area. Since it's an inverse squared deal and requires a high altitude air burst to maximize coverage area, you don't actually get much bang for the buck (yes, I'm going to hell for that pun) out of EMP attacks.

And so, we are safe from just how big of an EMP attack? What happens if it is bigger than that?
 
  • #27
A discussion about EMP is a bit off-topic for this thread, IMO.
 
  • #28
I still run my 65 Mustang 6-cylinder with a home-built points distributor. My car friends think I am nuts, but the spark is longer than the electronic one, and that is why MSD invented Multiple Spark Discharge to duplicate a points arc.

YES, we are talking about a spark...but it is triggered mechanically with points. The 6 has more time to build a charge than a V8 with 6 rather than 8 lobes. Add a hotter coil (100 to 1 windings) with a slightly lower resistance ignition resistor (.8 ohm to 1.4 ohms) and the primary sees a little higher voltage making the output a little more.

My research shows electronics in today's cars is more for controlling emissions, controlling Fuel Injection, shifting automatics, and reducing maintenance for customers. A points spark can take the internal combustion engine well into 7000RPM. Changing points (BWD Select Points, cond., rotor, cap, use best available materials) and with copper plug wires (not recommended with computers) voltage loss to my platinum plugs is minimum. I guess a DIESEL engine would be a better comparison with mechanical compression ignition.
 
  • #29
Don't forget the acoustic guitar. It worked just fine long before the electric amplified one...but probably would not work in a Heavy Metal band.
 
  • Haha
Likes Klystron
  • #30
.Scott said:
Check out the AREE robot for Venus exploration:
https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-low-tech-rover/

There was elaborate clockwork before electronics.
In fact, the first computer design, Babbage's engine, was entirely mechanical.

A wind up rover is a pretty cool idea, wonder what they are planning on using for spring materials? Need some pretty fancy metals to avoid relaxation at the 450 odd C on the surface...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and anorlunda
  • #31
Charlie Cheap said:
Don't forget the acoustic guitar. It worked just fine long before the electric amplified one...but probably would not work in a Heavy Metal band.
That applies to more or less every orchestral instrument. It's only very recently that electronic instruments have become as 'rich' as conventional, mechanical instruments which developed on a trial and error basis with very little knowledge of the actual Physics involved.
That's not a statement about quality or worth, btw.
 

1. What are mechanical equivalents of electronic things?

Mechanical equivalents of electronic things refer to devices or systems that perform the same function as electronic components but use mechanical mechanisms instead of electrical circuits.

2. Why are mechanical equivalents used?

Mechanical equivalents are used for a variety of reasons, such as cost-effectiveness, reliability, and simplicity. They may also be used in situations where electronic components are not suitable, such as in high-temperature or high-vibration environments.

3. What are some examples of mechanical equivalents of electronic things?

Some examples include mechanical switches instead of electronic ones, mechanical timers instead of electronic ones, and mechanical calculators instead of electronic ones. Other examples include mechanical sensors, relays, and solenoids.

4. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using mechanical equivalents?

The advantages of using mechanical equivalents include lower cost, higher reliability, and simpler design. However, they may also have limitations in terms of speed, precision, and complexity compared to electronic components. They may also require more maintenance and be less adaptable to advanced technologies.

5. How are mechanical equivalents and electronic components related?

Mechanical equivalents and electronic components are related in that they both serve the same purpose of controlling or manipulating energy. They may also be used together in hybrid systems, where mechanical and electronic components work together to achieve a specific function.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top