Mechanical Similarity: Solving Equation 10.2

  • Thread starter Thread starter msbell1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of equation 10.2 from Landau and Lifgarbagez's "Course of Theoretical Physics." The key point is the transformation of coordinates and time, where velocities and kinetic energy are adjusted accordingly. The relationship between the ratios of time and linear dimensions, t'/t = (l'/l)^(1-k/2), is derived from the transformation factor B = A^(1-k/2). Participants express appreciation for the clarity provided in explaining the derivation process. This exchange highlights the importance of grasping the mathematical relationships in mechanics for deeper theoretical understanding.
msbell1
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have recently embarked on a quest to read through (and hopefully to understand) all 10 volumes of the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifgarbagez. Well, I have already found myself hung up on section 10 in Volume I (Mechanics, 3rd Edition). Specifically, I am stuck on how equation 10.2 was derived. For those of you that do not have the book available (and for those that don't feel like pulling it off the shelf), here's my problem.

The authors first state that we are only interested in potentials which are homogeneous functions of the coordinates (homogeneous of degree k). They then say that we will carry out a transformation in which the coordinates are transformed by a factor A: ra -> Ara, and time is transformed by a factor B: t -> Bt. They then state that velocities will be transformed by A/B, and the kinetic energy by A2/B2. That makes sense to me. Then, since the potential U is homogeneous of degree k, in the Lagrangian U will have a factor of Ak in front of it. Since the Lagrangian can be multiplied by a constant without changing the equations of motion, we need for the kinetic energy T to also have a factor of Ak in front of it. For this to happen, we have

A2/B2 = Ak

Solving for B gives B = A1-k/2

So far so good.

Now the authors claim that the equations of motion permit a series of geometrically similar paths, and the times of the motion between corresponding points are in the ratio

t'/t = (l'/l)1-k/2

where l'/l is the ratio of the linear dimensions of the two paths.

OK, how do they find this expression for t'/t? Thanks a lot for the insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, msbell1!

This thing
\frac{t'}{t} = \frac{l'}{l}^{1-k/2}
comes from
B = A^{1-k/2} where t' = Bt and l' = A l.

P.S. Good choice of the book! ;)
 
Thanks physicsworks! That helped a lot, and it makes sense now. I really appreciate your help.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top