Mechanics by Arnold Sommerfeld- review

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the review and evaluation of Arnold Sommerfeld's work in classical mechanics, particularly his textbooks. Participants explore the relevance, clarity, and historical significance of Sommerfeld's contributions, as well as comparisons with other classical mechanics texts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in Sommerfeld's classical mechanics work and seeks opinions on its content and philosophical inclinations.
  • Another participant praises Sommerfeld as a significant teacher in theoretical physics, highlighting the clarity of his mathematical derivations while noting the age of his texts and some outdated concepts.
  • A different participant mentions the importance of reading well-written textbooks, specifically comparing Sommerfeld's work with that of Whittaker and the Landau & Lifschitz series.
  • Another contribution references Pauli's lectures as a valuable resource that follows a similar style to Sommerfeld's but includes more modern topics, despite lacking classical mechanics content.
  • One participant acknowledges the historical impact of Sommerfeld's teaching on modern physics, particularly in quantum theory.
  • A recommendation is made for Herbert Goldstein's textbook, suggesting it effectively prepares readers for quantum physics and connects classical mechanics to quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the significance of Sommerfeld's work and its clarity, but there are differing opinions on its current relevance and the necessity of supplementing it with more modern texts. No consensus is reached on the superiority of Sommerfeld's work compared to other classical mechanics texts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that Sommerfeld's texts were written in the 1940s and 50s, which may affect their applicability to contemporary physics. There are also references to specific mathematical concepts and historical context that remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators in physics, particularly those interested in classical mechanics and its historical development, as well as those seeking recommendations for foundational texts in the field.

Bleakfacade
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
I am trying to dig deep into classical mechanics. Among many suggestions, this was an odd one to me. I know of Arnold Sommerfeld and his work, but I have not read any of his works(books, papers, .etc). I tried to find reviews of this book online to no avail. If there are people who have read the book, may I ask you to give me a brief review? What inclinations and school of thought does Sommerfeld adhere to? I have gone through the book, its chapters but I thought I'd get some opinions before I begin studying it in detail. I thank all responses in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sommerfeld was one of the greatest theoretical-physics teachers of all time. Just look at the Nobel-prize winners' list and check, who is a pupil of Sommerfeld's. The six-volume set "Lectures on theoretical physics" immediately shows, how this comes about. It's simply very good. He gives precisely all the mathmatical steps in a derivation with utmost clarity. Nevertheless, it's not a simple read. In my opinion the best volume of the entire great set is Vol. 6 on partial differential equations of mathematical physics.

Of course, these books are pretty old (written in the 1940ies and 50ies) and thus not always up to date (e.g., he uses the "##\mathrm{i} c t## metric" for relativity or no Dirac ##\delta## distribution to define Green's functions although in fact he has invented this idea as early as around 1910). You should definitely have a look at Sommerfeld's textbooks but make sure to also have a look at more recent textbooks on the same subject. Of course, as far classical physics is concerned, there's not too much to be desired.
 
Believe me, there's always a benefit from reading a well-written, not outdated textbook. For classical mechanics, there are 2 major textbooks of the 1920's: the one by Sommerfeld and the one by Whittaker. 1930s brought us a third amazing piece of writing: the 1st volume of the Landau & Lifschitz series.
 
Another great older work are Pauli's lectures. They are in the Sommerfeld style but cover also more modern topics as wave mechanics (the best book on wave mechanics I know). Interestingly there's no classical mechanics, but the series starts with electrodynamics. The last volume is about quantum field theory. It's a good source to learn about the details of free propagagors in time-position representation but otherwise this volume is only of a historical interest. The other 5 volumes are masterpieces with high value also for modern students.
 
Thank you all so very much. This is certainly enlightening.
@vanhees71: Now that is some studentship Sommerfeld had, goodness me! I am overwhelmed, it seems he nurtured modern physics in his classrooms. I never knew that he was this central to Quantum theory.
 
I would have to recommend Herbert Goldstein. I have 2nd edition, and chapters 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11 do a great job preparing you for quantum physics at the level of J. J. Sakurai's text on Modern Quantum Mechanics. To give you and idea of what I mean, I'm attaching a step-by-step word document I extracted from Goldstein, chapters 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 connecting classical physics to old quantum mechanics, and the Schrödinger and Heisenberg's paths to QM. Please share the file if it's useful.
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K