Mechanics homework confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomPag
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
TomPag
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Mechanics homework
Relevant Equations
123
I have been given the following homework:
?hash=482c827f77e4315baba64b36e91b6eab.webp

For the first question a), I am not sure if i should create 2 right triangles for the strings as drawn in the picture, where the sum of the sides opposing the block are not equal to 2, or if i should say the strings go into the block and touch each other, so that the right triangles created have sides opposing the block equal to 2. If i choose the first option, which makes the most sense, the length 2 m becomes useless, and im not sure how i would solve it. Does anyone have any ideas?
Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • image2 (3).webp
    image2 (3).webp
    36.4 KB · Views: 34
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome!
I believe that you can consider a triangle of sides 1.25-2-1.25, assuming that the two strings coincide with the center of mass of the block, and that the opposite ends coincide with the axis of rotation (since there is no given information that contradicts those assumptions).

Diagrams are usually drawn by other than the problem creator, reason for which can be confusing.

562F4D72-6322-4024-9F29-D720480B7D9A.webp
 
TomPag said:
For the first question a), I am not sure if i should create 2 right triangles for the strings as drawn in the picture, where the sum of the sides opposing the block are not equal to 2, or if i should say the strings go into the block and touch each other, so that the right triangles created have sides opposing the block equal to 2. If i choose the first option, which makes the most sense, the length 2 m becomes useless, and im not sure how i would solve it. Does anyone have any ideas?
You could:

a) State that you believe the question posed can’t be answered and briefly explain why.

b) Propose a revision to make answers possible. E.g. replace the 4 kg ‘rectangular’ mass with a 4 kg point mass*.

c) Provide answers based on b).

It may be worth noting that a right-angled triangle with hypotenuse 1.25 m and another side 1.00 m is, in fact, a ‘3-4-5’ triangle.

*Edit: I originally typed '5 kg' but I meant '4 kg'.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444