Mechanics of double helical gears

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hihiip201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gears Mechanics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanics of double helical gears, specifically focusing on the stability and axial alignment of herringbone gears. Participants analyze the forces involved in gear meshing and the implications of axial misalignment in various applications, including turbines.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the credibility of the Wikipedia explanation regarding stable and unstable configurations of double helical gears, suggesting their analysis of forces contradicts the source.
  • Another participant explains that herringbone gears consist of two helical gears of opposite hand, which can either compress or pull apart based on axial forces, leading to stable or unstable configurations.
  • It is proposed that axial misalignment can cause gears to move along their shafts, potentially leading to disassembly or damage to bearings, with two interpretations of "disassembly" discussed.
  • A later reply emphasizes that axial forces from misaligned gears can push them towards the wider end of the shafts, while misaligned belts or chains may behave oppositely.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the credibility of the Wikipedia explanation and the implications of axial misalignment. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific mechanics and consequences of these forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity on the assumptions regarding gear alignment and the definitions of stability in the context of double helical gears. There are unresolved aspects regarding the mathematical modeling of forces and their effects on gear behavior.

hihiip201
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
A herringbone gear can be made by placing two helical gears of opposite hand face to face. The two are then bolted together. When being driven, the total axial force is balanced. The equal and opposite forces from the sides either compresses the halves together (stable) or pulls them apart (unstable). If the pinion is in axial tension (unstable) then the bull gear will be in axial compression (stable). If the direction of rotation, or of energy transfer is reversed, then the opposite becomes true and the pressure is taken on the “back” of the tooth.

Now consider a gas or steam turbine reduction gear. Since the direction of rotation and of energy transfer are fixed by the application it can be arranged that the bull gear be under (stable) compression and that a stronger solid pinion is in (unstable) tension.

Assuming that the shafts are parallel, self alignment requires that at least one of the gears can move axially. If the shafts are not sufficiently parallel then there will be a significant asymmetry of the axial forces that will attempt to align the gears but that can never happen because the shafts remain misaligned and both gears will travel progressively away from the apex of their shaft misalignment.

The term “disassembly” mentioned on the wiki page could mean two things.

1. It could mean that the two halves of the bull gear separate because the forces that were holding the halves together have now reversed and so they are pulled apart, spreading the shaft bearings.

2. Or that because of an axial misalignment, end thrust is present that moves both the poorly meshed gears along their shafts in the same direction, until they push one end bearing from the gearbox.

The thing that you are doing wrong is assuming wikipedia has credibility.
 
Analyze the force on the entire gear pair. There is a resultant force in the axial direction. The resultant force due to the other gear pair is used to nullify this axial force, so that the resultant axial force on the two pairs is zero.
 
Baluncore said:
A herringbone gear can be made by placing two helical gears of opposite hand face to face. The two are then bolted together. When being driven, the total axial force is balanced. The equal and opposite forces from the sides either compresses the halves together (stable) or pulls them apart (unstable). If the pinion is in axial tension (unstable) then the bull gear will be in axial compression (stable). If the direction of rotation, or of energy transfer is reversed, then the opposite becomes true and the pressure is taken on the “back” of the tooth.

Now consider a gas or steam turbine reduction gear. Since the direction of rotation and of energy transfer are fixed by the application it can be arranged that the bull gear be under (stable) compression and that a stronger solid pinion is in (unstable) tension.

Assuming that the shafts are parallel, self alignment requires that at least one of the gears can move axially. If the shafts are not sufficiently parallel then there will be a significant asymmetry of the axial forces that will attempt to align the gears but that can never happen because the shafts remain misaligned and both gears will travel progressively away from the apex of their shaft misalignment.

The term “disassembly” mentioned on the wiki page could mean two things.

1. It could mean that the two halves of the bull gear separate because the forces that were holding the halves together have now reversed and so they are pulled apart, spreading the shaft bearings.

2. Or that because of an axial misalignment, end thrust is present that moves both the poorly meshed gears along their shafts in the same direction, until they push one end bearing from the gearbox.

The thing that you are doing wrong is assuming wikipedia has credibility.


thanks, your explanation of stable and unstable make sense (as far as having two helical gears put together)

,hence I also understand how 1 is disassembling the gear train.


however, can you explain 2 again ? maybe with a picture? I'm not quite sure i follow what you mean by moving both gears along their axial direction?



thanks!
 
“2” can occur with any pair of gears or friction rollers.

If the two shafts are not parallel then the slightly misaligned force of the gears pushing against each other, (due to contact angle), results in an axial component that will tend to move the gears towards the wider spaced end of the two shafts.

The opposite can happen with misaligned belt or chain drive, when the pulleys tend to move towards the closer end of the two shafts.

The gear does not have to move on the shaft as the shaft can be moved with the gear. It is the shaft axial pressure that can damage or push out a shaft bearing. Any contact noise between the gears will act as a hammer, with the axial component traveling along the shaft to an end bearing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K