Mechanics Problem - Power, Finding The Resistance and Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small car driving up a hill at a constant velocity, with a focus on calculating resistance to motion and initial acceleration after reaching a horizontal road. The subject area includes mechanics, specifically power, forces, and motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate resistance and acceleration using power and forces, but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their approach, particularly regarding the assumptions made in part B.
  • Some participants question whether the power output remains constant and how that impacts the calculations for acceleration.
  • There is discussion about whether to use the same force or wattage in part B, indicating confusion about the relationship between power, force, and resistance.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the assumptions about power and force. Some guidance has been offered, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach for part B.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty about the implications of the car's power output remaining constant and how that affects the calculations for acceleration. The original poster is also unsure about the correctness of their resistance calculation in part A.

FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A small car with a mass of 1200kg is driving up a hill with a slope of sin^-1(1/15) at a constant velocity of 20m/s. The power developed by the engine is 25000W.

Part A: find the resistance to motion.

Part B: At the top, the road becomes horizontal. Find the initial acceleration, assuming the resistance is unchanged.


Homework Equations


P=Fv
F=ma



The Attempt at a Solution


Part A: R = resistance to motion
<br /> P=Fv \\<br /> 25000=F20 \\<br /> F=\frac{25000}{20}=1250N \\<br /> mgsin(arcsin(\frac{1}{15})) + R = 1250 \\<br /> 784+R=1250 \\<br /> R = 1250-784=466N \\<br />

Part B:
<br /> F=ma \\<br /> 1250-466=1200a \\<br /> 784=1200a \\<br /> a=\frac{784}{1200}=0.653ms^{-2}<br />

Part B I am a bit unsure of, my mind tells me the net force is the starting force (1250) minus one lot of resistance (466), however two of my peers have had the total force to be 466. Also it depends on whether I got part A correct and I am not 100% on that either.

Any help appreciated :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi FaraDazed! :smile:

Your A looks ok to me, and your B is ok if the force is the same.

However, I suspect it's the power that's the same … otherwise why would they ask for the initial acceleration?
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi FaraDazed! :smile:

Your A looks ok to me

Thanks :)

tiny-tim said:
and your B is ok if the force is the same.

However, I suspect it's the power that's the same … otherwise why would they ask for the initial acceleration?

Sorry I am confused now lol, Yeah the power output of the car remains constant I think, so my part B is wrong?
 
FaraDazed said:
Yeah the power output of the car remains constant I think, so my part B is wrong?

In part B, you've used the same F (1250) …

don't you need to use the same wattage?
 
tiny-tim said:
In part B, you've used the same F (1250) …

don't you need to use the same wattage?

Sorry if I am missing something obvious :shy:. Where can I factor the wattage into part B? To find the acceleration I am using the force provided by the engine which is calculated using the wattage (25000/20) minus the resistance force. F=ma can't work if I used the wattage (25000) instead could it?

Thanks,
 
tiny-tim said:
Your A looks ok to me, and your B is ok if the force is the same.

However, I suspect it's the power that's the same … otherwise why would they ask for the initial acceleration?
Since it asks for initial acceleration, the speed can be taken to be the same (as long as we assume the hill levels out smoothly). So if the power is the same then the thrust is also the same.
If the hill levels out suddenly it gets rather complicated. There's a trajectory to consider, the elasticity of the tyres, conservation of momentum...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K