Mechanics question: Three masses and a pulley on a tabletop

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zayan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of three masses and a pulley system on a tabletop, specifically analyzing the acceleration of blocks A, B, and C. The first approach uses the equation Mcg - T = Mc*a for block C and T = Mb*a for block B, leading to an acceleration of a = Mcg/(2m + mc). The alternative method considers the entire system, yielding a = Mcg/(mc + ma + mb). Both approaches yield consistent results, but the second method is preferred for calculating internal forces, as it simplifies the analysis by treating blocks A and B as a combined system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with tension in pulley systems
  • Knowledge of normal force interactions
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Newton's second law in multi-body systems
  • Explore tension calculations in pulley systems
  • Learn about normal force and friction in mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of pseudo forces in accelerating frames
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding dynamics in multi-body systems involving pulleys and friction.

Zayan
Messages
63
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Find mass of block C such that there is no relative motion between B and A
Relevant Equations
F=ma.
The diagram is below
Screenshot_2025-10-08-20-15-49-93_6012fa4d4ddec268fc5c7112cbb265e7.webp
.


My approach is first finding acceleration of block C and hence B because it would be equal. So writing equations Mcg-T=Mc*a.

I'm confused about the second equation.
I first wrote T = Mb*a. My intuition is that because Only tension is acting on block B towards right, it would be the one responsible for horizontal motion of block B. So solving we get a= Mcg/2m+mc. Using this as acceleration of frame I considered pseudo force on block A causing normal reaction with block B hence writing friction equals gravitational force on A. This gives the value of Mc as 2m/(u-1).

But going back to the second equation, I could also write equation for the whole system, i.e, a= Mcg/mc+ma+mb. Using this approach the answer comes out to be 10m/u-1. Which of the approach is correct and why so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter whether block A is nailed to block B, held to block B by friction (or, sliding down block B). As far as an external horizontal force is concerned, A and B form a single object of their combined mass.

It is the same if you are pulling a cart. You have to accelerate the cart and everything inside it (unless things can slide backwards).
 
PeroK said:
It doesn't matter whether block A is nailed to block B, held to block B by friction (or, sliding down block B). As far as an external horizontal force is concerned, A and B form a single object of their combined mass.

It is the same if you are pulling a cart. You have to accelerate the cart and everything inside it (unless things can slide backwards).

Makes sense. Also, upon further inspection I think I forgot that when B is accelerating, there is also normal force between A and B which is opposing the tension. So to avoid calculating internal forces we consider it a system.
 
If you consider A and B as a system, the only net external force acting on it is the tension on the rope. In this case the mass of the system is ##m_A+m_B##.
$$T=(m_A+m_B)a$$
If you consider the blocks A and B separetely, the net force on B is the resultant of the tension in the rope and the normal force produced by A acting on B. In this case you only take ##m_B## when writing Newton's second law.But in this case you have another equation for B as well:
$$ T-F_N=m_A a $$
$$F_N=m_B a$$
If you add these two equations you get the equation for the system.
Both points of view give the same result but if you want to calculate the normal force you need to consider the blocks separately.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
946
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
836
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K