Problem with two pulleys and three masses

[Erdi]

Homework Statement

I cant figure out how to solve this task. I have got two pulleys, top pulley (A) and bottom pulley(B).
The pulley (A) is stuck to the wall and cannot move. The pulley B hangs in a thread and can
therefore moveup and down. Here m1 = 0.5 kg and m2 = 2.0 kg. Both pulleys can rotate freely. All
the pulleys can be are massless and there is no friction in the system.

How large must M be for m1 to be at rest?

Look at the figure.


Thanks for help!

Relevant Equations

T1 - m1g = ma, where a = 0

I know that the tension from pulley B (T1) has to be equal the m*g of m1 for m1 to have acceleration = 0. But i can't figure how this works because the m2 is already heavier. And so the block(M) has to be negative weight?

 

[Erdi]

Heres the figure:

 

[hutchphd]

If M is zero which direction will m1 move? The problem is not a statics problem.

 

[Erdi]

If M is zero, and also the pulley(b) is massless. Then the only thing weighing on the right side would be m2 that is 2kg. So the m1 that is 0.5kg would move upwards right?

 

[hutchphd]

What would (M=0) be the tension in the string if the pulleys are ideal and massless?

 

[Erdi]

Are you thinking of the tension on the string T1 (on m1 from pulley B) or the tension on the string T2 (on M from m2) For in both cases i would say it is (T = m2g = 2*9.81 = 19.64N)

 

[hutchphd]

If M=0 then m1 will be accelerating down at g (there will be no constraint or T). If M is large then m1 will be accelerating up. Clearly somewhere in between m1 will have a=0
Draw a free body diagram for each mass and Newton for each . Put in the constraints from the pulley. Set a=0 for m1 (but not m2 m3)

 

[Erdi]

I may be wrong here, but i think youre confusing m1 with m2. Because the constraint on m1 is affected by the pulley(B) which is again affected by both m2 and M. So if M is zero, the m2 will still be 2kg. So the m1 will still be constrained by m2 that is 2kg even though M = 0kg.
Also here is the free body diagram i drawed:

 

[Erdi]

In the original figure the mass M seems to be heavier than m2, that is why the tension on m2 is larger than the tension on M in the diagram.

 

[hutchphd]

The tension in a massless rope is everywhere the same.
There are only two ropes.
G is not force

 

[hutchphd]

So the m1 will still be constrained by m2 that is 2kg even though M = 0kg.

No. The rope will have no Tension

 

[Erdi]

Alright i kinda get it because T2 = Mg = 0*9.81 = 0.
But what happens to the m2 then? It has a mass, what about the tension from that object?

 

[hutchphd]

It falls. "Tension from an object" is not a thing.

 

[hutchphd]

Write down Newton for m2 and for M

 

[Erdi]

I drawed a new figure if M was to be 0 in this situation. But so what your conclusion is that fr m1 to stay at rest. In this situation M has to be 0 then?

 

[Erdi]

Write down Newton for m2 and for M

Newton for m2: 19.62N
Newton for M (if M is 0kg): 0

 

[hutchphd]

No that is not what I said. Reread#7

Newton for m2: 19.62N
Newton for M (if M is 0kg): 0

My apologies for my shorthand I meant write down Newton's Law for m2 and M

 

[Erdi]

No that is not what I said. Reread#7

My apologies for my shorthand I meant write down Newton's Law for m2 and M

So Newtons 2.law is F = ma
Where F will be T - mg, so it is T - mg = ma
But since M is zero, the tension will be 0
So it is -mg = ma
For M that is ofcourse 0, but i don't understand m2
-m2*g = mM*a => -m2*g = 0, so the tension here will also be 0?

 

[kuruman]

For whatever it's worth, here is a different approach.

1. Assume that the pulley on the right is attached to the ceiling. Find the tension $T(M,m_2)$ in the string connecting it to the ceiling as a function of $M$, $m_2$ and $g$.
2. Answer the question, "if $m_1$ is at rest, what must the tension $T_1$ be in the string attached to it?"
3. Set $T_1 = T(M,m_2)$ and solve for $M$.

 

[Erdi]

For whatever it's worth, here is a different approach.

1. Assume that the pulley on the right is attached to the ceiling. Find the tension $T(M,m_2)$ in the string connecting it to the ceiling as a function of $M$, $m_2$ and $g$.
2. Answer the question, "if $m_1$ is at rest, what must the tension $T_1$ be in the string attached to it?"
3. Set $T_1 = T(M,m_2)$ and solve for $M$.

T_1 has to be equal the m1*g => 4.905N
T_m2 = 2*9.81 = 19.64
T_M = x
T_1 = T_M * T_m2 => 4.905 = 19.64 * M
T_M = 4.905 / 19.64 = 0.25N = 0.025kg?
Or did you mean T_1 = T_M + T_m2?
In that case T_M = 4.905 - 19.64 = -14.73N = -1.5kg??

 

[kuruman]

It is correct to say that $T_1=m_1g$. You missed my point for the rest of what you have to do. The picture below shows a massless pulley attached to the ceiling and two unequal masses $M$ and $m_2$. The first step is to find an expression for tension $T_2$ in terms of $m_2$ and $M$. The second step is to set the expression equal to $m_1g$ and solve for $M$.

On Edit:
Tension $T_1$ mentioned above is the tension in the piece of the rope that is attached to mass $m_1$ as defined in item 2, post #19. It is not tension $T_1$ shown in the figure above. I am sorry for the unfortunate choice of subscripts and the confusion it might cause.

 

[hutchphd]

I like @kuruman approach fine.
I note that the title of the thread is incorrect and belies the problem. This system is not in equilibrium. Just be aware of the mis-statement please.

 

[Erdi]

Yea.. the title got corrected incorrectly by an admin. Anyway tho. If only look at the system with pulley B attatched to a rope and start finding an expression for T2 in terms of m2 and M. Isnt the expression just:
T2 = T(m2 + M) like you wrote down above? So that M = T2 - m2?

 

[kuruman]

Yea.. the title got corrected incorrectly by an admin. Anyway tho. If only look at the system with pulley B attatched to a rope and start finding an expression for T2 in terms of m2 and M. Isnt the expression just:
T2 = T(m2 + M) like you wrote down above? So that M = T2 - m2?

I did not write T2=T(m2+M). I wrote $T_2=T(M,m_2)$. This means "find $T_2$ as a function of $m_2$ and $M$." When one writes $f(x)=x^2+3x$, one does not mean $fx=x^2+3x$.

 

[Erdi]

Oh my bad. Right i don't know why i didnt mention it before, but i know that's how i get solution to answer. The problem is, i have searched a lot around. But i can't find the formula for what the tension for T2 will be when we have two masses m2 and M. I have looked at several videos and other questions, but i can't find the specific solution to find that expression..

 

[kuruman]

Oh my bad. Right i don't know why i didnt mention it before, but i know that's how i get solution to answer. The problem is, i have searched a lot around. But i can't find the formula for what the tension for T2 will be when we have two masses m2 and M. I have looked at several videos and other questions, but i can't find the specific solution to find that expression..

Can you find an expression for $T_1$ in the figure in post #21? If so, how do you think $T_1$ is related to $T_2$?

 

[Erdi]

T1 = mg + ma. And i guess that T2 is equal to T1 because the rope and is massless and the pulley are frictionless or something? In that case, could you please try to just give a very understandable reason why it is equal.

 

[erobz]

T1 = mg + ma. And i guess that T2 is equal to T1 because the rope and is massless and the pulley are frictionless or something?

If $m_1$ is not accelerating, is the lower pulley accelerating vertically? What does the answer to that imply about the force balance on that lower pulley?

 

[Erdi]

If $m_1$ is not accelerating, is the lower pulley accelerating vertically? What does the answer to that imply about the force balance on that lower pulley?

If m1 isn't accelerating the lower pully can't be accelerating vertically. Which implies that the force balance on the lower pulley will be in equalibrium?

 

[Erdi]

If m1 isn't accelerating the lower pully can't be accelerating vertically. Which implies that the force balance on the lower pulley will be in equalibrium?

So the mass M is the same as m2 then?? M = 2kg?