I Melting point of graphite and diamond?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the melting points of graphite and diamond, highlighting significant discrepancies in reported values across various sources. Graphite's melting point is often cited around 3,550°C, while diamond's melting point ranges from approximately 3,000°C to 4,027°C, creating confusion even among AI responses. The melting point of tungsten is consistently reported at about 3,422°C, making it a reliable reference point. The conversation also notes that both graphite and diamond sublimate rather than melt, complicating the definition of their melting points. Overall, the variability in data leads to uncertainty regarding the true melting points of these carbon allotropes.
Warp
Messages
139
Reaction score
15
TL;DR Summary
It's strangely difficult to find these temperatures online. Different sources give wildly different values. What are the actual temperatures?
I was conversing with ChatGPT when I asked which material has the highest melting point, and it answered "tungsten" (giving its melting temperature). It so happened that in the previous question the melting point of graphite had come up, and it was listed as higher than that. When I asked which one of the two has the higher melting point, it insisted that it's tungsten, even though in that very response it listed a higher temperature for graphite. ("Graphite has a melting point of approximately 3,550°C (6,422°F), while tungsten has a melting point of approximately 3,422°C (6,192°F). Tungsten has the higher melting point between the two materials.")

In fact, other similar AIs also give wildly different answers (and most of them incorrect by the numbers).

This seemed to be an AI hallucination, so I googled what the melting point of graphite is, and to my surprise I found wildly different answers from different sources, varying by, like, a thousand degrees.

(Yes, I know that graphite, and diamond, do not melt per se, they sublimate. However, by "melting point" I mean "the temperature at which it stops being a solid.)

Turns out that also the melting point of diamond seems equally vague. Googling for it gives wildly different results:

"Diamond has a very high melting point (almost 4000°C)"
"Thus, we infer that diamond melts at about 9,000 K and between 0.60 and 1.05 TPa along the Hugoniot."
"In case of Diamond, the melting point is 3550 degrees Celsius"
"However, the melting point of diamond is estimated to be around 3,000-3,500°C (5,432-6,332°F)."
"Using carbon's theoretical phase diagram below (from Wikimedia), "liquid diamond" could be achieved at about 10 GPa (99 thousand atmospheres) and 5000 K (4700 °C)."
"Diamond has the highest melting point (3820 degrees Kelvin)"
"The ultimate melting point of the diamond is around 4,027° Celsius (7,280° Fahrenheit)"

No wonder the AIs are confused about it. So am I.

In comparison, the melting point of tungsten seems to be quite universally agreed upon (and likewise all AIs give a very consistent value for it).

What is the melting (well, sublimation) point of graphite and diamond? (I suppose I should add, under normal pressure conditions.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Warp said:
Turns out that also the melting point of diamond seems equally vague.
A diamond will burn in the air at about 400°C. That makes melting diamond difficult, as it will often react chemically before it melts.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Graphite, grapheme. diamond and liquid carbon are all phases. At atmospheric pressure, there may not be a direct phase transition from one phase to another. What is the freezing point of steam?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Graphite, grapheme. diamond and liquid carbon are all phases. At atmospheric pressure, there may not be a direct phase transition from one phase to another. Where is the freezing point of steam?
It doesn't freeze here, but it does in Oymyakon. So is it somewhere near Omsk?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top