I Metal Ball Rolling in a Parabolic Bowl in the presence of a magnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modifying a Lagrangian mechanics equation for a point-like ball rolling in a parabolic bowl by introducing an additional force from a magnet. The magnet's force is described as having an inverse square distance dependency, which would attract the ball towards its position. The original poster seeks guidance on how to incorporate this magnetic force into the existing Lagrangian framework or to find a Newtonian solution for the problem. They mention that adding potential energy (U) to the Lagrangian is a general approach for such modifications. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on integrating external forces into the Lagrangian formulation.
alikim
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How to modify the equation of motion of a ball in a parabolic bowl to include an extra external force?
I found this equation as a solution to the original problem of a point-like ball rolling without friction in a parabolic cavity from Lagrangian mechanics:

1727789903639.png


Is it possible to add an extra force to this equation? I want to add a "magnet" at a certain position that will affect the ball. The magnet here being a force that will have an inverse square distance dependency and pull the ball to the point where the magnet is located.

I would know how to do it better if I had a Newtonian solution with forces but I couldn't find any.

I'd appreciate it if anyone could point me to a Newtonian solution or explain how to modify the Lagrangian for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Coming back to Lagrangian add -U to it where U is potential energy you set. This is a general prescription.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top