Calculate Rolling & Friction for Ball Motion in Plane w/ Force Field

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaumzaum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Rolling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a ball rolling without slipping in a plane influenced by a force field. Participants explore the calculations involved in determining the ball's trajectory, particularly the relationship between the vertical position (y) and horizontal position (x) under the influence of various forces, including friction and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the initial conditions of the problem, including the force field acting in the y direction and the initial velocity in the x direction, and seeks to derive y as a function of x.
  • Another participant suggests a scenario involving an inclined plane and discusses the implications of forces acting on the ball, including gravitational components and potential gyroscopic effects due to the ball's rotation.
  • A question is raised about the nature of the force field (h) and whether it is gravitational, along with the assumption of gravity's presence in the problem.
  • Some participants emphasize that the condition of "rolling without sliding" implies a relationship between the center of mass velocity and the velocity at the point of contact, suggesting that friction acts in opposition to the center of mass velocity.
  • One participant references a model of rolling friction and its implications for the distance traveled by a deformed wheel, indicating a specific approach to understanding rolling resistance.
  • Another participant notes the complexity of rolling motion due to angular momentum changes and the effect of external forces on the circular radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanics of rolling motion and the forces involved, with no clear consensus reached on the nature of the force field or the implications of rolling without slipping. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effects of gravity and the specifics of the force field.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of the force field and the conditions under which the ball rolls. The discussion includes references to specific models and experimental observations that may not be universally accepted or applicable.

jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
I want to describe the motion of a ball that rolls without slipping in a plane where acts a force field not in the direction of the motion. To illustrate better, the ball is put on the origin, there is a field h in y direction, and a velocity v0 in the x direction. There is also a friction force parallel to the plane in a way that the balls always rolls without slipping in the plane. How can I calculate y in function of x?

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/280x200q90/673/08e7ea.png

I've tried to solve this, but I'm having problems. I know the only torque acting on the particle is Ff.R (Ff = friction force, R is the radius of the ball). So Ff.R = I.γ (I is inertial momment of the ball, γ is the angular acceleration). If I substitute I by 2/5 MR² and γ by a/R I get Ff = 2/5 Ma. But the problem is there, can I do this substitution? Also, is the direction of the friction force opposite to the instantaneous velocity of the particle? Is the ball is rolling in a way that [itex]\vec{ω}[/itex] is always perpendicular to [itex]\vec{v}[/itex]? I don't know how to go on from there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the side force, you could imagine that the ball is rolling initially horizontally on an inclined plane, with force perpendicular to the initial velocity = m g sin(θ), where θ is the angle of the plane (from a level planel). The force is only initially perpendicular to the path; as soon as the ball starts to roll downwards on the inclined plane, a component of the force is in the same direction as the path of the ball.

Complicating matters is the fact that the ball's axis of rotation is yawing (relative to the plane), and I'm not sure if some type of gyroscopic precession effect would be involved and/or if a twisting torque occurs at the point of contact (assuming zero slippage).
 
Last edited:
What sort of force field is h? Is it the gravitational field? if it isn't the gravitational field what is the formula for the force exerted by the h field to the ball? Do we also assume there is gravitational field in this problem (perpendicular to the x-y plane of the given figure)?
 
Well anyway seems to me that the condition imposed of "rolling without sliding" means that the velocity of the c.o.m is always equal and opposite of the linear velocity of the point of contact , hence the friction force is also in the opposite direction of the c.o.m velocity.
 
Delta² said:
Well anyway seems to me that the condition imposed of "rolling without sliding" means that the velocity of the c.o.m is always equal and opposite of the linear velocity of the point of contact , hence the friction force is also in the opposite direction of the c.o.m velocity.

Sorry I forgot to say
There is a gravitacional field perpendicular to the Sheet, otherwise there would be no friction

Force exerced on ball is m h
 
See my article " The polygon model of rolling friction" in the journal IJEERT
 
This is not so simple. Rolling balls have angular momentum that change in direction by external forces:
$$ \textbf{τ} = \frac{\partial\mathbf{L}}{\partial{t}} $$
and cyrcular radius varies.
 
As per Reynolds experiments the distance advanced by the wheel in on revolution is less than 2πR when the wheel is deformed at the contact area, which is in agreement with my model "Polygon Model of rolling Friction" The distance advanced by the wheel in one turn is only the perimeter of the polygon inscribed in a circle corresponds to the deformation.
Dr. Muhammed Arif M
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K