Methane gas deflagration temperatures

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TonopahJoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Methane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the safety concerns related to methane gas deflagration temperatures, particularly in the context of a power plant's natural gas venting practices. Participants explore the risks associated with methane venting, ignition temperatures, and the importance of safety regulations in industrial settings.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the dangers of venting methane gas downward onto people and ignition sources, emphasizing the need for vertical venting to prevent accidents.
  • Another participant cites that methane is flammable only within a specific concentration range of 5-15% in air.
  • A participant mentions the auto ignition temperature of methane is 580°C and the adiabatic flame temperature is 1950°C, suggesting that ignition in the atmosphere would yield temperatures lower than this.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for methane to create ignitable concentrations even in open areas, with references to past incidents involving gas explosions.
  • A participant shares their experience with the consequences of methane-related accidents, highlighting the importance of safety training and awareness in the workplace.
  • Another participant emphasizes a safety-first work ethic, noting that prioritizing safety can slow down operations but ultimately saves lives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the safety of methane gas, with some acknowledging its risks while others downplay its dangers. There is no consensus on the best practices for handling methane or the perceptions of its safety among workers and management.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the complexities of methane behavior under different conditions, including its density changes when vented and the specific concentration ranges required for ignition. There are unresolved questions regarding the exact temperatures and conditions under which deflagration may occur.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in industrial safety, gas handling practices, and the risks associated with combustible gases may find this discussion relevant.

TonopahJoe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The power plant I work at has four 170Mw combustion turbines that are supplied with 500 psig natural gas. Periodically the fuel gas pipeline and its associated heat exchangers and filter vessels need to be depressurized for maintenance purposes. Until I intervened recently, a large volume of this gas was vented off to atmosphere in a downward direction onto people and a number of potential ignition sources such as electric carts, pickups, motor starter contactors, lighting, etc., through a 2-inch line. I know this because I was one of the people who "felt the cool breeze" of the methane on my skin one night. But I had to fight an uphill battle to modify the vent lines to vent the methane vertically.

Unbelievably, workers and even management simply don't believe that a methane gas cloud will form in a relatively open area nor do they believe that it can ignite. Some even believe that the gas rises because CH4 "is lighter than air". It's not hard to find video and pictures of explosive gas accidents and disasters, but these guys can't see the connection so I'm trying to educate them with the facts so they don't blow themselves (and most importantly me) up in the process.

I know that the gas cools as its pressure drops increasing its density to where it will settle into low spots as it diffuses into the atmosphere, and that a deflagration (fire ball) can easily occur, but I don't know what temperature to expect if ignition occurs in the atmosphere. Anybody got a clue?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Auto ignition temperature is 580°C (obviouly in a concentration between the LEL and UEL). Adiabatic flame temperature (at constant volume) is 1950°C so in your scenario, you'll be looking at something less than that.

As far as fuels go, methane is a pretty safe gas. As your colleagues tell you, methane is indeed less dense than air, and does dissipate quite freely into the atmosphere (unlike propane and butane, which can be incredibly dangerous if allowed to collect in low areas). However, your installation must still comply with the gas regulations for your country (and it's insane for methane in any concentrations to be vented directly onto electrical components).

Report your concern to the nominated responsible person at your facility.
 
Hello TonopahJoe-
Although methane can ignite in only a small range of concentration (see post #2), it can be very dangerous if it collects in an enclosed area. I have seen demonstrations by (I think Bureau of Mines) where a flame (shock wave) propagated in a long 4 inch diameter plexiglass tube filled with coal gas (methane). I have seen the damage caused by an accidental liqiud hydrogen spill which vaporized and collected under the roof of a physics laboratory, and blew the roof off. Even in an open area, like your situation, venting methane will have an ignitable concentration somewhere, and will create a shock wave when it ignites.
Bob S.
 
Gentlemen:

Thank you all for the information and validation. We stopped venting the CNG down onto equipment (after I brought in OSHA to convince my site management to stop this insane practice). Although our plant alone spends over $250,000,000 on CNG and has four large H2 cooled generators, we treat these gasses as if they're as harmless as air.

Not surprisingly, we had four deaths within 10 months of each other which resulted in the removal of our top management, replacing them with people who are absolutely committed to putting a stop to the fatalities and injuries. To the shock of many, my plant manager (and many others) thought of himself as a shoe-in for a new position as director of all the generating plants, but having twice pounced on me for bringing in OSHA--even after being told that I was not to be "stifled" in any way when it comes the pursuit of safety issues by the big cheese after the first time he pounced on me--the position went to a person who recently worked for him. Ouch.

That had a big impact on him and raised a lot of eyebrows, and suddenly others in leadership positions are jumping on the safety band wagon. It's about time. Top management has already acted on my request that we all be trained on explosive gasses, and I am gathering as much information as I can on the subject from enough sources to convince the non-believers that this stuff can really hurt you under certain circumstances.

I have a unique perspective: I witnessed a CNG explosion in one of our boilers during a "puff". The explosion tore the welds of 18 inch I-beam webs like tissue paper causing a hundreds of thousands to repair, plus lost revenue. I also know two people who were badly burned by natural gas in "accidents". They were the lucky ones who survived the incredibly painful burn treatments, keeping one of them out of work for over 2 years. While, I may not have much of a career path with this company, I do have a clear conscience. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
Good man, you seem have the right attitude.

Working (as I do) for a huge American-owned company, our work ethic now is "no job is so important that we can't take the time to do it safely". It can really slow things down at times, but it's for the right reasons and people are avoiding death as a result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
40K