MHB Method of dominant balance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance Method
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation $y''-(2+x^2)y=0$ using the method of dominant balance for large x. The approach involves assuming a solution of the form $y=e^w$ and deriving the equation for $w$. The dominant balance leads to two main solutions for $w'$, one with $a=1$ resulting in $w' = x + \frac{1}{2}x^{-1} + \frac{1}{8}x^{-3}$, and another with $a=-1$, yielding a different expression. The participants clarify that while multiple forms appear during the process, only two distinct solutions ultimately arise, consistent with expectations for the equation. The method effectively illustrates how to balance terms to derive the required approximations.
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
solve (first three terms) $y''-(2+x^2)y=0$ using the method of dominant balance (for large x).

I solved this and got 4 different solutions when I think I should be getting 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:
solve (first three terms) $y''-(2+x^2)y=0$ using the method of dominant balance (for large x).

I solved this and got 4 different solutions when I think I should be getting 2.
The method here is that you look for a solution of the form $y=e^w$, where $w$ is some function of $x$ that has to be determined. Then $y' = w'e^w$, $y'' = (w'' + w'^2)e^w$, and the equation $y''-(2+x^2)y=0$ becomes $w'' + w'^2 = x^2+2.$

As a first approximation, you try $w' = ax^\alpha$. Then $w'' + w'^2 = a\alpha x^{\alpha-1} + a^2x^{2\alpha}$. We want this to look like $x^2+2$ for large $x$. The dominant term there is clearly $x^2$, and to make this balance with the dominant term in the expression for $w'' + w'^2$, we need to take $\alpha=1$ and $a^2=1$. That gives you two possible answers, one for $a=1$ and one for $a=-1.$

Taking the case $a=1$ (so that $w'=x$), we look for a second term, so that $w'$ is then of the form $w' = x+bx^\beta$ (where $\beta<1$). In that case, $w'' = 1 + b\beta x^{\beta-1}$ and $w'^2 = x^2 +2bx^{\beta+1} + b^2x^{2\beta}.$ Thus $w''+w'^2 = x^2 + 1 +2bx^{\beta+1} + b\beta x^{\beta-1} + b^2x^{2\beta}.$ Comparing this with $x^2+2$, we see that the term $x^2$ already balances. The next thing to look for is the constant term. In the expression for $w''+w'^2$ it is 1, but we want it to be 2. So we need an additional 1, and we can get that by taking $\beta=-1$ and $b=\frac12.$ Thus $w' = x + \frac12x^{-1}.$

In a similar way, for the third term we take $w' = x + \frac12x^{-1} +cx^{\gamma}$ (where $\gamma<-1$). Then $w'' = 1 -\frac12x^{-2} +c\gamma x^{\gamma-1}$ and $w'^2 = x^2 +1 + \frac14x^{-2} + 2cx^{\gamma+1} + cx^{\gamma-1} + c^2x^{2\gamma}.$ Thus $$w''+w'^2 = x^2 + 2 -\tfrac14x^{-2} + 2cx^{\gamma+1} + c(1+\gamma)x^{\gamma-1} + c^2x^{2\gamma}.$$ This time, we already have the $x^2+2$ that we want, but we need to eliminate the unwanted term $-\tfrac14x^{-2}$. To do that, take $\gamma=-3$ and $c=\frac18$, so that the term $2cx^{\gamma+1}$ becomes $\tfrac14x^{-2}$ which balances out the unwanted term.

Thus the three-term approximation for $w'$ is $w' = x+\frac12x^{-1}+\frac18x^{-3}$. (You then need to integrate this to get $w$ and then exponentiate it to get $y$.) Notice that the only stage where there was any choice in the parameters was in the first step, where we took $a=1$ rather than $a=-1$.

Taking $a=-1$ and applying the same method, I get the second solution as $w' = -x -\frac32x^{-1} +\frac{15}8x^{-3}$ (but I haven't checked that and I don't guarantee its accuracy). So there are indeed two solutions, as there should be.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
606
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K