Methyl 2 hydroxybenzoate hydrogen bonding

AI Thread Summary
Methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate can potentially form multiple hydrogen bonds due to its hydroxyl group and carbonyl oxygen. The discussion suggests that it could form two hydrogen bonds, but there is uncertainty regarding the exact number. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding. The conversation encourages exploring plausible molecular structures to verify bonding possibilities. Understanding these interactions is crucial for accurately determining the compound's hydrogen bonding capacity.
Zayn
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How many hydrogen bonds can methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate form with molecules of the same compind?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



There's a hydroxyl group on the second carbon of the benzene ring and a double-bonded oxygen with 2(3?) lone pairs, so I'm thinking that it would form 2 hydrogen bonds, but I'm not sure. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many groups are involved in one hydrogen bond?

Have you tried to write plausible structures?

Would you know how to check your conjectures?
 
Molecules of same compound...? So Inter molecular H-bonding. Also remember that there are intra molecular H-bonds possible.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top