Metric Tensor: Symmetry & Other Constraints

In summary: That's a very important point, because it means that the metric does not depend on the choice of coordinate system.No, the metric must be differentiable, but it is not necessary that it be continuous.
  • #1
quickAndLucky
34
3
TL;DR Summary
What are the mathematical constraints on the metric?
Aside from being symmetric, are there any other mathematical constraints on the metric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Physical interpretation requires some other features like
[tex]g_{00}>0, g=det(g_{ik})<0[/tex]
in (+---) 0123 convention.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
anuttarasammyak said:
Physical interpretation requires some other features

Not the ones you state. It is perfectly possible to have a metric tensor that violates your conditions, if the coordinates are chosen appropriately.

Physically, the metric tensor must have a (1, 3) signature (or (3, 1) if we choose the opposite signature convention), but that in no way requires the condition you impose on the particular components.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
  • #4
PeterDonis said:
but that in no way requires the condition you impose on the particular components.
That’s clearly true for the sign of ##g_{00}##, but for the statement about the determinant?
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
  • #5
Nugatory said:
for the statement about the determinant?

The determinant of a 3-submatrix is not constrained. The determinant of the full metric is, but I don't think that's the determinant that the poster in post #2 meant, since he used the indexes ##ik##, which usually means just the "spatial" indexes. He's welcome to correct me if I am wrong.
 
  • #6
PeterDonis said:
He's welcome to correct me if I am wrong.
I intended i,k=0,1,2,3. Thanks.
 
  • #7
anuttarasammyak said:
I intended i,k=0,1,2,3.

Ah, ok. Then your constraint on the determinant is correct, but your constraint on ##g_{00}##, as noted, is not.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
  • #8
Now I know for an example in rotating system ##g_{00}<0## for region r > c / ##\omega## where no real body cannot stay still to represent coordinate (r,##\phi##). Thanks.
 
  • #9
anuttarasammyak said:
Now I know for an example in rotating system ##g_{00}<0## for region r > c / ##\omega## where no real body cannot stay still to represent coordinate (r,##\phi##). Thanks.

There are plenty of examples. Just a few off the top of my head:

Null coordinates in Minkowski spacetime, and the various kinds of null charts in curved spacetime (for example, Eddington-Finkelstein, Kerr-Schild).

Painleve coordinates in Schwarzschild spacetime, at and inside the event horizon.

Static coordinates in de Sitter spacetime, at and outside the cosmological horizon.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
  • #10
Isn't there also a requirement that the metric be continuous and twice differentiable in order that the curvature tensors are well behaved?
 
  • #11
I think the correct statement is already made, i.e., the pseudometric (I insist on calling it NOT metric, because it's not positive definite, it's the fundamental form of PSEUDO-Riemannian manifold and not a Riemannian one, and that's very important physics wise since it allows for defining a causality structure of spacetime) must be non-degenerate and have the signature (1,3) (west-coast convention) or (3,1) (east-coast convention). That means the the components ##g_{\mu \nu}## form a real symmetric ##4 \times 4## matrix with 1 positive and 3 negative (or 3 positive and 1 negative) eigenvalue. Consequently the determinant ##\mathrm{det}(g_{\mu \nu})<0##. Since GR is covariant unders general diffeomorphisms of the coordinates at any point in spacetime you can choose "Galilean coordinates", such that in this one point ##(g_{\mu \nu})=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)## (or ##(g_{\mu \nu})=\mathrm{diag}(-1,1,1,1)##).
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
797
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
778
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top