Michelson-morley interforometer.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the operation of a Michelson-Morley interferometer, specifically focusing on the detection percentage of photons when using a symmetrical beam splitter. Participants explore the implications of beam splitting and reflections in the context of light paths and interference patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various interpretations of how the beam splitter operates, with some attempting to calculate the percentage of photons detected based on their understanding of reflections and transmissions. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about the beam paths and the implications of the setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning each other's reasoning and calculations. Some have offered corrections to initial misunderstandings about the beam splitter's function, while others are exploring the implications of phase differences and the conditions under which detection percentages may vary.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding terminology, particularly between reflection and refraction, which may impact participants' understanding of the problem. Additionally, the lack of explicit information about the path lengths to the mirrors is noted as a factor in the discussion.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
I had a question in the exam that asked how much percantege of the photons are detected when the beam splitter, is a symmetrical beam splitter, i.e: |In>->(1/sqrt(2))(|Transmitted>+i|Reflected>)

well, at first 50 percentage is reflected and 25 goes to the right hand mirror, and quarter goes to the up mirror, afte the mirrors refelct the waves back, 50 percent form each wave is refelceted, and 50 percent goes through, (the detector is placed parallel to the up mirror), 50 percent from the 25 percent goes through which goes downside is getting detected, which mean 1/8 of the photons are being detected, is my reasoning correct?

if this question is suitable to HW then move it there, I am just not sure it's suitable for Advanced physics cause it's in a first year course, but then agian it's not for high school mechanics.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
loop quantum gravity said:
well, at first 50 percentage is reflected and 25 goes to the right hand mirror, and quarter goes to the up mirror

No. This is wrong.
A 50/50 BS splits a beam in one half, which goes to mirror one (50%) and one half, which is reflected and goes to mirror two (50%). It does not split the beam in three parts as you suppose. Where should a reflection back to the source come from?

So during the second reflection 50% of each beam go to the detector and 50% are directed back to the source. This adds up to a total of 50% being detected.
 
Cthugha said:
No. This is wrong.
A 50/50 BS splits a beam in one half, which goes to mirror one (50%) and one half, which is reflected and goes to mirror two (50%). It does not split the beam in three parts as you suppose. Where should a reflection back to the source come from?

So during the second reflection 50% of each beam go to the detector and 50% are directed back to the source. This adds up to a total of 50% being detected.

Remember that the interference of the recombined beams can be distructive or constructive toward the detector. So the fraction reaching the detector can be 100% or zero or anything in between, depending on the path difference between the two arms of the interferometer. For white light and an arbitrary path difference, the fraction is generally close to 50%.
 
now as i look at it, it should be 100 percent.
here's my calculation:
|R>->1/(sqrt2)*(|R>+i|U>)->1/sqrt(2)*(|L>+i|D>)->1/sqrt2*(1/sqrt2(|L>+i|D>)+(1/sqrt2)i(|D>+i|L>))=|D>
which mean it's 100 precent, or am i wrong in my calculations?
 
anyway my english perhaps isn't that good but i know that reflected means returned, goes back, and refracted means like in light refraction.

in the exam, it was written (in english!) reflected!
how on hell should i know, he means refracted, the TA and the Lecturer who also visited in the exam to answer to questions didn't see this mistake, i guess the other students understood as refracted.
 
country boy said:
For white light and an arbitrary path difference, the fraction is generally close to 50%.

Ok, as there was no path difference given, I assumed that.

loop quantum gravity said:
anyway my english perhaps isn't that good but i know that reflected means returned, goes back, and refracted means like in light refraction.

in the exam, it was written (in english!) reflected!
how on hell should i know, he means refracted, the TA and the Lecturer who also visited in the exam to answer to questions didn't see this mistake, i guess the other students understood as refracted.

Reflection does not mean going back necessarily. Reflection means that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. Both are 45° here.
If you shine light on a mirror, which is turned around 45° from your point of view, the reflected light won't return to you as well.
 
Last edited:
what about my post 4 in this thread is my calculation wrong there?
 
In case, that the paths to both of the mirrors have equal length and the beam splitter is an ideal 50:50 BS, this is true, because there is a phase difference of pi/2 between the split light beams. This is quite remarkable as usual mirrors give a phase difference of pi.
 
****, i could have got a good grade, i hate this when i know the material but get ****ed by trivialities.
btw, it wasn't given that the mirrors are placed with the same length from the splitter, although the picture does suggest that's the case, i thought you can deduce this solely by the algebra that iv'e done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K